reason, other than the reason of fraud or collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts or contravention of any of the provisions ... reason of (a) fraud; or (b) collusion; or (c) any wilful misstatement; or (d) suppression of facts; or (e) contravention of any of the provisions
within the time required by section 109, or that the omission or misstatement of any particular with respect to any such mortgage or charge ... extended, or, as the case may be, that the omission or misstatement be rectified, and may make such order as to the costs
alleged that the petitioner company had suppressed facts and it had wilfully misstated the facts when it filed the prices list ... Thus it was alleged that there was wilful suppression and misstatement of facts and the company had refused to comply the summons issued
paid or erroneously refunded by reason of fraud, collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts, or contravention of any of the provisions ... been levied by reason of fraud, collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts, or contravention of any of the provisions
secondly, that they had also failed to report to the shareholders the misstatement contained in the Profit and Loss Account regarding the gross income such ... misstatement being an understatement of the income resulting from a direct deduction of the sales commission from the sales in the Trading Account, which
reason that the charges of fraud or collusion or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts or contravention of any of the provisions of this
reason of either fraud or collusion or wilful misstatement or suppression of
facts or contravention of any of the provisions of the Act or Rules ... service tax was not paid on account of any fraud, collusion, wilful
misstatement or suppression of fact and that there was intent to evade
payment
offered for the defendant.
18. Upon this first imputation there is one misstatement of fact. According to the article, it was plaintiff who explained that ... that the defendant must fail here because he is guilty of two misstatements of fact. These misstatements are, it is said, first, that, according
SEBI regulations and guidelines. It is
pointed out that the alleged misstatement in the prospectus is not a
matter which is covered by Section ... under the SEBI Act for any complaint to be
entertained concerning the misstatement made in the prospectus, Mr.
Amit Sibal, learned counsel for the Petitioner
Price Waterhouse & Co. And Ors. vs Sebi on 9 September, 2019
Author: Tarun Agarwala
