Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Authorities and submitted that the same cannot be treated as a mitigating circumstance. 15. Considering that the Petitioner is a local and has hearth

Authorities and submits that the same cannot be treated as a mitigating circumstance. Page 4 of 5 18. Considering that the Petitioner is a local

opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there are no mitigating circumstances and in view of the bar contained in Section

there being no mitigating circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain the bail application. 9. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands rejected. (V. NARASINGH) Judge

conscious and exclusive possession of the Petitioner. Since there are no mitigating circumstances and keeping in view the rigors of Section-37 and the twin

NDPS Act and submits that there are no mitigating circumstances. 7. It is the further submission of learned counsel for the State that since

there being no mitigating circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain this bail application. 8. The BLAPL is accordingly rejected. 9. Learned Court

there being no mitigating circumstances, opposes the prayer for bail of the Petitioner. 9. Taking into account that the Petitioner is a lady, bleak chance

Prima facie there being no mitigating circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain this bail application. 9. Accordingly, bail applications are rejected. 10. Learned

grams of Ganja and there being no mitigating circumstances, in view of the Bar contained under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, this Court