raised by the
learned Referring Judge are as follows:
(i)Whether the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in Manikandan ... law laid down by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Commissioner of Police and others v. Sandeep Kumar , reported in
(2011) 4 MLJ
should override other laws, which reads as follows:
"35. The provisions of this Act to override other laws.-The provisions of
this Act shall ... therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force.
Thus, the SARFAESI Act will override other laws including the provisions
basis of mere comparison. In the judgment reported in 1997 (2) MLJ 37
( Dhanakodi Padayachi Vs. Muthukumaraswami ), the Hon'ble High Court ... Civil Procedure Code.
13. In the judgments reported in 1968-2-MLJ-48, (1971)84-LW-348, 1976-1-
MLJ
Taalamalai Chetty vs. Rathinasamy
02.2001(1)CTC 281 = 2001(1) MLJ 371, in the case of Mohamed Ali vs. Abdul Sinab ... Instruments Act.
30.No doubt, in the judgment reported in 1982(1)MLJ 431, which was followed in AIR 1992 MADRAS
Information Commr.) and the decisions of this Court reported in 2013 (5) MLJ 134 (Registrar General of High Court of Madras ... Elango), 2013 (5) MLJ 385 (Registrar General, High Court of Madras Vs. A.Kanagaraj), 2013 (5) MLJ 513 (Registrar General, High
quote the said decision of this Court reported in 2011 (4) MLJ 438 (cited supra) for the ratio-decidendi of this Writ Petition ... dictum laid down by this Court in 2011 (4) MLJ 438 (cited supra) is as follows:
"Writ Petition has been filed
Others V. Registrar General, High Court, Madras and Another (2011) 2 MLJ 785 and the judgment of the Apex Court in Annamalai University ... law. ...
(ii) That was a batch of cases, wherein, the petitioners were law graduates and they completed the law course based on the post-graduate
scheme with some modifications which has been reported in (1939) II MLJ 11.
(iv) G.O.Ms.No.894, Rural Welfare Dept. dated ... Stand of the Government is that Petitioner has failed to perform the lawful duties enjoined on them
well settled principle of law that ignorance of law is not an excuse. Ignorance implies passiveness. Mistake implies action. Ignorance does not pretend to knowledge ... aside by reason of mistake of law, but not by reason of ignorance of law. Here, he must know the consequences of not paying
rendered. The decisions in Mayilswami Chettiyar v.Kaliammal, (1969) I MLJ 177, Angammal v.Balasubramanian, (1980) 1 MLJ 242, Sundaramoorthy ... Shanmugam Nadar, (1980) 1 MLJ 486 and Muthalu Ammal v.A.V.Amudham, (1977) 2 MLJ 215, which were relied upon
