working as Middle Management Grade Scale II officers (for
short, "MMGS-II") in the State Bank of India, its Bhopal
Circle have challenged ... given promotion to MMGS-III. They would be placed
in seniority below their respective immediate senior in
MMGS-II. The appellant is directed to complete
interview also shall be confirmed and placed
in the grade of MMGS-II. Those scoring less than 75% marks but
minimum ... Committee may confirm and give placement
(fitment) to such officers in MMGS II.
Provided that an officer directly recruited in any grade may be
required
MMGS-III and MMGS-III to SMGS-IV. Though different requirements are contemplated while effecting promotions from JMGS-I to MMGS-II, MMGS-II ... promotion policy from MMGS-II to MMGS-III brought out, reads as under:
"PROMOTION POLICY FROM MMGS-II TO MMGS-III:
1. The Promotion
next Higher case of Middle Management Grade Scale-II (for MMGS-II) for the years 1989 and 1990. They had completed all other eligibility criteria ... eligibility criteria for promotion form JMGS-I to MMGS-II, for a minimum period of two years would be followed. This was because
induction from officers in JMGS-I and MMGS-II
and thereafter by way of promotion. Officers in the JMGS-I and
MMGS-II, who were ... promotion from MMGS-II to MMGS-III
was held. Only those who had completed five years in MMGS-II grade
could appear in the said
Kishan Lal Ecn 26427 Officers Mmgs-Ii vs Chairman & Managing Director Bank Of ... on 22 November, 2018
Author: Rajesh Singh Chauhan
Bench: Rajesh Singh ... BENCH No. - 288 of 2014
Petitioner :- Kishan Lal Ecn 26427 Officers Mmgs-Ii
Respondent :- Chairman & Managing Director Bank Of Baroda B C C Mumbai
declare the Petitioner promoted to the post of MMGS-II,
during the year 2003-04 w.e.f. 9.2.2004;
(ii) to do away with ... order, he was allowed to participate in the promotion
test to MMGS-II and in compliance thereof, the Petitioner had appeared in
the test
imposes a punishment of
reduction in lower grade i.e. MMGS - III to MMGS -II, While fixing the basic at
the maximum of the scale ... major punishment of “reduction in lower Grade i.e., MMGS III to
MMGS II by fixing the basic pay of the petitioner at the maximum
imposes a punishment of
reduction in lower grade i.e. MMGS - III to MMGS -II, While fixing the basic at
the maximum of the scale ... major punishment of “reduction in lower Grade i.e., MMGS III to
MMGS II by fixing the basic pay of the petitioner at the maximum
promotion process held during 1987 for promotion from
MMGS III to SMGS IV ,MMGS II to MMGS III and JMGS I to
MMGS II ... II
MMGS 60 240 995 1235
II to
MMGS
III
MMGS 53 212 442 654
II to
SMGS
IV
Hence it is recommended that
