Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12260 (1.39 seconds)

Harishbhai Vallabhbhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat on 11 May, 2018

Dinubhai   Bhikhabhai   -   accused   no.1,  Sanatkumar   Ranchodbhai­accused   no.26,   Punambhai  Laljibhai   ­accused   no.29,   Natubhai   Mangalbhai­   accused  no.40,   Dilipbhai   Ranchodbhai   ­accused ... accused   -   Hemantbhai   Gokalbhai   ­accused  no.22,   Sanatbhai   Ranchodbhai   -   accused   no.26,  Dharmeshbhai   Natubhai   ­accused   no.30,   Vinubhai  Shanabhai   ­accused   no.32,   Dilipbhai   Vinubhai   ­accused
Gujarat High Court Cites 66 - Cited by 0 - A Kureshi - Full Document

State vs Akram And Ors on 23 January, 2024

seen accused Akram in the mob, who was waiving hands and was calling other members of the mob. Accused Akram threw a petrol bomb ... School. Ct. Amit identified accused Akram in that video and accused Akram was also appearing as part of that mob. PW14 recorded statement
Delhi District Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Manjeet Singh 17 Ors on 7 January, 2025

them were shouting slogans. Accused Pappe Singh and other accused Sandeep were also present. Accused Manjeet Singh was leading the mob and was shouting that ... fire by the said public persons/mob. The mob was being led by accused Manjeet Singh and he was BC of PS Kalyan Puri. Accused
Delhi District Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Sh. Rohit on 17 January, 2023

ACCUSED ROHIT 13. As already noted herein above, PW1 did not help the prosecution in establishing presence of accused in the mob. Ld. Special ... when accused was called in the police station, that these two officials purportedly informed the IO that accused was present in the mob
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Sh. Rohit on 17 January, 2023

ACCUSED ROHIT 13. As already noted herein above, PW1 did not help the prosecution in establishing presence of accused in the mob. Ld. Special ... record identifying accused in the mob. Both of them claimed identifying only one person in the mob i.e. accused. 14. In the case
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . on 20 March, 2023

mob of 10- 12 people, the intention of which mob was to prevent such inspection. Neither of these witnesses could also identify the accused ... aspect of identification of accused, it stands established that accused was one of the members of the mob which attacked team of BSES
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next