conversations are recorded in the memory card and
the initial conversations are of date when that memory card or
mobile with recording facility was with ... that mobile
handset with call recording facility for recording is itself not
substantiated. The identity or photograph of that mobile handset
with memory card allegedly
conversations are recorded in the memory card and
the initial conversations are of date when that memory card or
mobile with recording facility was with ... that mobile
handset with call recording facility for recording is itself not
substantiated. The identity or photograph of that mobile handset
with memory card allegedly
conversations are recorded in the memory card and
the initial conversations are of date when that memory card or
mobile with recording facility was with ... that mobile
handset with call recording facility for recording is itself not
substantiated. The identity or photograph of that mobile handset
with memory card allegedly
conversations are recorded in the memory card and
the initial conversations are of date when that memory card or
mobile with recording facility was with ... that mobile
handset with call recording facility for recording is itself not
substantiated. The identity or photograph of that mobile handset
with memory card allegedly
said seizure list pertaining to the seizure of
the memory card and mobile phone was made by the Investigation
Officer but was not reflected ... 352159/11/067148/2* being model Samsung A50S. The Memory
card and mobile phone were handed over to the Investigating Officer
during investigation. However
said seizure list pertaining to the seizure of
the memory card and mobile phone was made by the Investigation
Officer but was not reflected ... 352159/11/067148/2* being model Samsung A50S. The Memory
card and mobile phone were handed over to the Investigating Officer
during investigation. However
investigating officer for sending muddemal property
consisting of mobile phones and memory card for
forensic examination, has been allowed. The principal
grievance of the petitioners ... officer seized properties, including the
aforesaid muddemal property consisting of mobile
phones and memory card. The said property remained
in the custody of the Court
containing Vodafone
Sim no. 9811013277, memory card was seized
from Sh. K.K.Thomas. The said mobile phone
was containing recorded conversation and the
video ... Kumar, Security Guard, NDMC.
He witnessed the seizure of mobile phone, data
cable, memory card and charger by CBI.
PW-25 Sh. Radhey Shyam, Superintendant
accused on the bed and took out its
memory card. She handed over the said memory card to IO WSI
Ramwati on 08.9.2014 who seized ... took out the memory
card from the phone. I handed over the said memory
card of the accused's mobile phone
mobile phone having a memory card inside
it while they were sitting in the car. The memory card of the
mobile phone of the complainant ... memory card was taken out
from his mobile phone and it was again inserted in the mobile
phone of the complainant. The mobile phone
