Search Results Page

Search Results

61 - 70 of 16017 (0.81 seconds)

Escorts Ltd. vs Cce on 30 May, 1995

issue for determination falls within a narrow compass: admissibility or otherwise of Modvat Credit in case inputs are used in the manufacture of products declared ... appellants alleging that the appellants were availing the benefit of Modvat Credit under Rule 57-A of Central Excise Rules after filing Modvat declaration under
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 13 - Cited by 28 - Full Document

M/S Essar Steel Limited vs Cce, Ludhiana on 16 March, 2011

Additional Commissioner, Ludhiana by his order dated 12.08.2004 had disallowed the modvat credit to the tune of Rs. 37,55,264/- and had ordered recovery ... invoice or 57G invoice for which they were not suppose to issue modvatable invoices and consequently in relation to the goods in question were received
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 6 - Cited by 17 - Full Document

Amco Batteries Ltd. vs Cce on 11 June, 1999

into ingots, are not duty paid since they do not take Modvat credit of duty paid on them. Ld. Advocate submits that the adjudicating authority ... said authority. It was only in the context of not taking the Modvat credit that the appellants admitted their non-duty paid character. But actually
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 4 - Cited by 16 - Full Document

Bpl Sanyo Ltd. vs Cce on 15 December, 1995

manufacture of their final products VCP/VCR/Television sets for grant of Modvat benefit. The dry cell batteries are required for operating the Remote Control ... Madhya Pradesh Collectorate that it had been decided not to allow Modvat Credit on dry battery cells used in the manufacture of electronic quartz clocks
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 5 - Cited by 26 - Full Document

Lupin Laboratories Limited vs C.C.E. on 30 December, 1997

order of the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Indore disallowing modvat credit on certain items. 2. The facts of the case in brief ... final products. The department alleged that the items on which modvat credit as capital goods was taken were not machines, machinery, plants, equipments, apparatus, tools
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi Cites 5 - Cited by 21 - Full Document
Previous   3 4 5 6 7   8 9 10 11 12 Next