Varma 1958 SCR 499, State of U.P. v. Mohammad Nooh , 1958 SCR 595; and K.S. Venkataraman and Co. (P) Ltd. v. State ... extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226. (See State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh , Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa
formulation by Das, C. J., in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammad Nooh , where he observed;
It must be borne in mind that there ... certiorari jurisdiction, the Constitution Bench in State of Madhya Pradesh v. Mohammad Nooh , AIR 1958 SC 86, laid down as follows :
"On the authorities
decision of the Supreme Court in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammad Nooh , AIR 1958 SC 86 : 1958 SCR 595, that there was no reason ... Constitution."
38. On these observations the decision in Mohammad Nooh 's case, AIR 1958 SC 86 was distinguished and held inapplicable
Supreme Court in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammad Nooh , (AIR) 1958 SC 86, was clearly of the opinion that the rule ... stated by the Supreme Court in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammad Nooh (supra) as follows:
"On the authorities referred to above it appears
decision of the Supreme Court in U. P. State v. Mohd. Nooh , AIR 1958 SC 86. Mohd. Nooh was a police constable. He was dismissed ... dated 21-12-1948 and 7-6-1949 were challenged by Mohd. Nooh by filing a writ petition in this Court. The petition was allowed
Constitution Bench judgement in State of Uttar
Pradesh v Mohammad Nooh , 1958 SCR 595, the
relevant paragraph reading:
'10. In the next place ... adequate legal remedies...'
(emphasis supplied)
16.2. The aforesaid paragraph from
Mohammad Nooh (supra) has been approvingly
referred to by the Hon'ble Supreme
decision in the case of State of U.P. v. Mohammad Nooh , AIR 581(6) (sic) in Arjun Chaubey v. Union of India , relied upon ... Supreme Court in State of U.P. v. Mohammad Nooh , AIR 1958 SC 86 :-
"that the role of a Judge and witness cannot
decision of the Supreme Court in State of U. P. v. Mohd. Nooh , AIR 1958 SC 86, existence of alternative remedy is not an absolute ... writ petition. In Mohd. Nooh 's case, the Supreme Court even observed (vide para 11) :
"If an inferior Court or Tribunal of first
first respondent.
15. In State of U. P. v. Mohd. Nooh , AIR 1958 SC 86, the Supreme Court had stated, in paragraph 11, as follows ... Supreme Court rendered in State of U. P. v. Mohd. Nooh , AIR 1958 SC 86, and Mohd. Yunus v. Mohd. Mustaqim, , I held that
decision of the Supreme Court in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammad Nooh runs counter to the view taken in Special Civil Application ... Supreme Court Court in State of Uttar Pradesh v Mohammad Nooh 2, so far as the order rejecting a revision application is concerned, remains unaffected
