judgment on this subject is " State of
Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammad Nooh , AIR 1958 SC 86". This
case establishes the principle that ... exhaust that remedy before approaching the court.
ii). In this case, Mohammad Nooh, a government servant, was
dismissed from service following a departmental inquiry
Larger Bench. It amongst others held:
"The distinction adopted in Mohammad Nooh's case, AIR 1958 SC 86, between a Court
extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226. (See State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh , Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa , Harbanslal Sahnia ... India v. T.R. Varma , State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh and K.S. Venkataraman and Co. (P) Ltd. v. State of Madras have
decision of this Court in state of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh [1988] SCR 595. In the said case, a departmental enquiry was held against
Apex Court in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Mohammed Nooh - 1958 (1) SCR 595 held that justice should be done
aside. He has placed reliance on State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammed Nooh , 1958 SCR 595, Manak Lal v. Dr. Singhvi, 1957 SCR 575, State ... inquiry is liable to be quashed ( State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammed Nooh ) (supra).
41. It has been further submitted by the applicant that with
decision of this Court in State of U. P. v. Mohd. Nooh , 1958 SCR 595: (AIR 1958 SC 86). In the said case, a departmental ... grievously violated."
In its judgment in the case of Chairman-cum-MD, Coal India Ltd. & Others (supra), the Apex Court held that Plea
Perumbavoor,
Ernakulam - 686692
5. M.Abdul Manaf
S/o.Mohammed Nooh
Station Master, Southern Railway
Ambalapuzha
Residing at Padipura House
Thottappally P.O, Alepuzha
Pradesh V. Mohammed Nooh (2), it was held by this Court that the
principle of merger cannot apply in the case of an order
Pradesh V. Mohammed Nooh (2), it was held by this Court that the
principle of merger cannot apply in the case of an order
