extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226.
(See State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh [AIR 1958 SC 86] , Titaghur
Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State ... Supreme Court titled as
State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh , 1957 SCC OnLine SC 21, a five Judge bench
categorically observed that, provided
decision
reported in 1958 SCR 595 (State of Uttar Pradesh v.
Mohd. Nooh) had the occasion to observe as
follows:
"10. In the next ... extraordinary jurisdiction
under Article 226. (See State of U.P. v. Mohd Nooh,
Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa³,
Harbanslal Sahnia
reliance
on the judgment of this Court in the case of Mohammad Nooh
(supra) is concerned, no doubt that non-exercise of
jurisdiction under Article
natural justice; State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh , [AIR 1958 SC 86].
In the instant case, we have already held that the Collector
natural justice; State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh , [AIR 1958 SC 86].
In the instant case, we have already held that the Collector
natural justice; State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh , [AIR 1958 SC 86].
In the instant case, we have already held that the Collector
natural justice; State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh , [AIR 1958 SC 86].
In the instant case, we have already held that the Collector
natural justice; State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh , [AIR 1958 SC 86].
In the instant case, we have already held that the Collector
natural justice; State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh , [AIR 1958 SC 86].
In the instant case, we have already held that the Collector
natural justice; State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh , [AIR 1958 SC 86].
In the instant case, we have already held that the Collector
