Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson ... vs Competition Commission Of India And ... on 30 March, 2016
Author: Vibhu
extraordinary jurisdiction under
Article 226. (See: State of U.P. vs. Mohammad Nooh , AIR 1958
SC 86; Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. vs. State
Supreme Court in the State of Uttar Pradesh V. Mohammed Nooh ( AIR 1958 SC 86), A.V.Venkateswaran, Collector of Customs, Bombay V. Ramachand Sobharaj
have not
been exhausted. In The State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammad
Nooh , 1958 SCR 595, 605, S.R. Das, C.J., speaking
writ court in the
case of State of U.P. v. Mohammad Nooh ,
reported in AIR 1958 SC 86, held as under ... Apex
Court in State of U.P. v. Mohammad Nooh
(supra) still holds the field and in view of the
law laid down a writ
extraordinary
jurisdiction under Article 226. (See State of U.P. v.
Mohd. Nooh1 , Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State
of Orissa2 , Harbanslal Sahnia ... India v. T.R. Varma7 State of U.P. v. Mohd.
Nooh (Supra) and K.S. Venkataraman
extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226. (See State of U.P. v. Mohd.
Nooh, Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa, Harbanslal Sahnia ... India
v. T.R. Varma, State of U.P. v. Mohd. Nooh and K.S. Venkataraman and Co. (P)
Ltd. v. State of Madras have
Court
in the matter of the State of U.P. vs. Mohammad Nooh , AIR 1958 SC 86,
and especially paragraph 10 reproduced as under ... available would
be no answer. See State of U.P. Vs. Mohammad Nooh ,
AIR 1958 SC 86. The law has since then been
reiterated
writ court in the case of State of
U.P. v. Mohammad Nooh , reported in AIR 1958 SC 86,
held as under ... Apex Court in
State of U.P. v. Mohammad Nooh (supra) still holds the
field and in view of the law laid down a writ
Apex Court in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Mohammed Nooh - 1958 (1) SCR 595 held that justice should be done