Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 41 (0.72 seconds)

Dr.V.M.Ganesan vs The Joint Director

Petitioner Vs. 1. The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, (Prevention of Money Laundering Act & FEMA), Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue ... part of which represents money genuinely borrowed from a financial institution. The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 , completely ignores the fate of such persons

G.Gopalakrishnan vs The Deputy Director

attachment of properties under Section 5(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to ‘PMLA’) and subsequent filing of complaints under ... concerned while taking action for provisional attachment of property involved in money laundering, ought to have reason to believe and the same ought
Madras High Court Cites 175 - Cited by 0 - V Parthiban - Full Document

Narendra Kumar Gupta vs State Rep. By

legitimizing the illicit and tainted money and committed an offence of International Trade Based Money Laundering. (vi) Further investigation had revealed that the India-based ... money or possession of foreign money would attract the provisions of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and not the provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering
Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - A D Chandira - Full Document

P.Anand vs Assistant Director

reveal that the petitioner, being a money lender, had abetted Shri Dinesh Chand Surana in exercise of money laundering. xvi) Though the petitioner has been ... investigation and he had been concealing the money trail in the offence of money laundering. The arrest of the petitioner was under Section
Madras High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - A D Chandira - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next