Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code,
1954 (for short 'the MPLRC, 1954') provided for
appointment of Kotwars and their remuneration whereas
Section 216 made ... noteworthy to notice that under the Abolition Act, 1950
and the MPLRC, 1954 a Kotwar appointed by the Zamindar,
malguzar or the gaontia has been
Land Revenue Code 1959
(hereinafter shall be referred to as the 'MPLRC') was
already decided on 20.02.1980.
9. Vide order ... provisions contained in Section 168 (4) and Section 257
of MPLRC, jurisdiction to hear the matter will be
exclusively in the domain of a revenue
proceedings vide order dated 14/11/2017 under Section 51 of
the MPLRC. It is submitted that even at this stage when the
matter ... notice to the petitioner
and in clear violation of Section 51 of MPLRC, straightway
5
impugned order was passed whereby respondent No.1
cancelled
under the provisions of
Section 234 of M.P. Land Revenue Code (MPLRC). During
pendency of the suit, the Collector passed the order under
Part ... order dated
9.3.2006 as void and contrary to the provisions of MPLRC.
3. Defendant No.1 filed the written statement
denying all the plaint averments
issued notice u/s. 248 of M.P. Lands Revenue Code
(MPLRC). Later on, the said notice was cancelled and in Case ... another notice dated 23.6.1961 was issued u/s. 181
and 172 of MPLRC read with Section 39 of The Madhya Bharat
Zamindari Abolition
from u/s.
247(7) of the M.P. Land Revenue Code (MPLRC). Along with the
show-cause notice, the petitioner was also served with ... dated 19.2.2016 while exercising the powers u/s.
247(7) of the MPLRC and imposed the fine upon the petitioner to
the tune
done u/s. 178 of the M.P. Land
Revenue Code (MPLRC), therefore, the possession cannot
be granted u/s. 38 of the MPLRC. Thereafter ... dated 31.8.2017, Tehsildar Barwani allowed the application
u/s. 38 of the MPLRC and directed the Revenue Inspector to
issue a letter for handing over
Pradesh Land Revenue Code 1959
(hereinafter shall be referred to as the MPLRC) for the
purpose of protecting the government property and
encroachment was demolished ... appellant/
State is that they had given notice under Section 248 of
MPLRC before beginning such act of demolition but no
such notices were brought
come within the jurisdiction
under Sections 131 and 132 of the MPLRC. The Tehsildar is only
the Competent Authority for deciding the said dispute, therefore ... nature of the
dispute relates to Sections 131 and 132 of the MPLRC and the
Tehsildar is only the competent authority to decide the said
under Section 250 of Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code
(for brevity "MPLRC") was passed against the petitioner
herein directing removal of encroachment made ... Aggrieved, the
petitioner herein preferred an appeal u/S.44 of the MPLRC
before the SDO. This appeal of the petitioner suffered
dismissal
