Tehsildar
Huzur exercising inherent powers under Section 32 of MPLRC reviewed its
own order dated 20-06-2023 and stayed its execution and also directed ... However, the said order was reviewed exercising inherent power under
Section 32 of MPLRC. While reviewing the order, no approval from any
superior authority
transferable. Accordingly, the
petitioner has filed an application under Section 32 of MPLRC to the
Collector, Sheopur thereby requesting him to remove the said land ... been submitted nor the application filed by the
petitioner under Section 32 of MPLRC, 1959 has been decided.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner
setting aside the demarcation
proceedings, filed an application under Section 32 MPLRC before the Nayab
Tehsildar himself and the Nayab Tehsildar disposed of the application ... under
Section 32 MPLRC on 17.10.2025 by upholding his earlier order dated
13.06.2025.
3. The petitioners then challenged the order dated 17.10.2025 passed
Signature
Ram Gopal vs Of on 11 January, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
Ram Gopal vs Of on 11 January, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
Ram Gopal vs Of on 11 January, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
cause of action
arose after filing of an application under Section 32 of MPLRC by the
respondents against the appellants before Naib Tehsildar ... action arose only after the respondents initiated proceedings under
Section 32 of MPLRC and obtained an order against the appellants, which
was upheld in appeal
Revenue Authority/Tahsildar and the
proceedings under Section 250 of the MPLRC came to
be and thereafter when the plaintiff instituted a suit
before ... would also
be barred in view of Section 257 of the MPLRC."
32. In the considered view of this Court, the respondent
Revenue Authority/Tahsildar
and the proceedings under Section 250 of the
MPLRC came to be and thereafter when the
plaintiff instituted a suit before ... would also be
barred in view of Section 257 of the MPLRC."
32. In the considered view of this Court, the
respondent
Revenue
Authority/Tahsildar and the proceedings under Section 250
of the MPLRC came to be and thereafter when the plaintiff
instituted a suit before ... would also be
barred in view of Section 257 of the MPLRC.”
32. In the considered view of this Court, the respondent
