Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 193 (0.86 seconds)

Biharilal vs Pallu on 3 May, 2023

Tahsildar then initiated the procedure which is laid down in Section 129 of the MPLRC. The Tahsildar issued notices to all the parties including ... challenged by the respondents by filing an appeal under Section 129(5) of the MPLRC. The same has been allowed by the Sub Divisional Officer
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - M S Bhatti - Full Document

Jagdish Gaur vs Yagyadatt Mishra on 17 December, 2025

original order passed by the Tahsildar in terms of Section 129(4) MPLRC confirming mutation, was dated 05.08.2022 and the limitation period of 45 days ... Section 129(4) and therefore, this Court has no hesitation in holding that the Tahsildar had misapplied his jurisdiction conferred on him under Section 129
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bagdiram vs Lalchand on 22 August, 2023

land. 2. Respondent No.1 Lalchand submitted an application under Section 129 of MPLRC before the Tehsildar for demarcation of his land which was entertained ... properly written on 25.04.2019 but the procedure prescribed under Section 129 of MPLRC was followed. The Signature Not Verified Signed by: PRAVEEN Signing time
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document

Makundi Lal Pathak vs Bharat Lal Tiwari on 6 May, 2024

filed an application before the Sub-Divisional Officer under section 129(5) of the MPLRC and the SDO has rejected the application submitted ... fourth respondent-Tehsildar for fresh consideration in terms of Section 129(5) of the MPLRC. 6. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent has submitted
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next