respondent clearly amounted to unfair labour practice as contemplated under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 . He submitted though the Labour Court erroneously rejected
unfair labour practice under Item 6 of Schedule IV of the MRTU and PULP Act . In so doing the High Court erroneously ignores the fact ... permanent workmen.
14. Further, Item 6 of Schedule IV of the MRTU and PULP Act reads as follows:
6. To employ employees as badlis, casuals
Trade Unions and
Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (MRTU and PULP Act, 1971 ). This
Act specifically lists the unfair labour practices on part ... Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ; (b) Maharashtra Industrial Relations Act, 1946 ; (c)
MRTU and PULP Act, 1971 ; (d) Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices
caluse No.1(g) of Schedule
Schedule-IV of the
MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 ."
11. It is well settled that an acquittal
order. In
her view in presenting and filing the complaint under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 ,
original Opponent had committed no negligence or deficient
Bajaj Holdings & Investment Ltd ( ... vs Acit Ltu, Mumbai on 17 February, 2025
IN THE
Bajaj Holdings & Investments Ltd ( ... vs Addl Cit Rg 3(1), Mumbai on 17 February