Apex Court dated 25/8/2009 passed in SLP filed by
MSEB, challenging the order of remand passed by the
Division Bench of this Court ... interfere on that ground.
7. Points (i) to (vi) extensively urged by MSEB
8. Submissions and finding on Point No.(i) Whether the
Arbitral Tribunal
awarded a tender by Maharashtra State Electricity Board, for short "MSEB". MSEB placed three Work Orders upon the respondent as follows:
1. Work ... order is Rs. 4,18,04,825/-.
3. Both the contracts between MSEB and the respondent and the respondent and the appellant
successor in interest of Maharashtra State Electricity Board (for short
"MSEB") and appellant No. 2 is its Chairman. Respondent ... Pursuant to various contracts entered into between respondent No. 1 and
MSEB in the year 1993-94 for installation of "Low Tension Load
Management
Chairman of the Maharashtra State Electricity
Board (for short "MSEB"). Respondent No.2 - M/s Datar Switchgear Ltd. is
a company which ... entered into various contracts with MSEB for
installation of Low Tension Load Management System. Respondents No.3
and 4 are the senior officials of respondent
limited company incorporated on 4th December, 1997. The Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) holds 100% share capital of the petitioner. In or about December ... company on the one hand and the Government of Maharashtra and the MSEB on the other as also between the company and the financial institutions
granted.
This appeal has been filed by the Meghalaya State Electricity
Board (MSEB for short), a board duly constituted under Section 5 of
the Electricity ... filed by
the respondents by order dated 10.8.1998 by holding that the MSEB
had not framed any regulations regulating the service conditions of its
employees
respect of work order dated 27th March, 1997. The Petitioner No. 1 MSEB has also been directed to pay interest at the rate ... relevant and material for deciding this petition are: the Petitioner No. 1/ MSEB is incorporated pursuant to the provisions of Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 . When
compass of material facts. The assessee tax deductor Maharastra State Electricity Board (MSEB, in short), on 21st June, 1993, entered into an agreement with ... availing certain 'legal advisory services'. These services were required by MSEB as it intended to enter into a power purchase agreement to purchase
would charge no fees for future hearings "as my protest against MSEB's action and until such time as MSEB reconsiders the situation ... entire issue of revision of fees, with
"... any authorised representative of MSEB and the other contractors viz M/s. Surkan, Gannon Dunkerley
judgment, the Arbitral Tribunal by an interim direction, directed the petitioner ("MSEB") to deposit certain amounts which were permitted to be withdrawn ... renew them any further. The Guarantees were not invoked by the MSEB before expiry, as a result of a clause in the guarantees which made
