from 01.08.2010, they would withdraw all maintenance
services and stop payments, including MSEB bills, directing the Society to assume
responsibility. They also demanded refund
supply. As
observed by the Supreme Court in Swastic Industries
v. MSEB (vide para 5):-
Page 1123 It would, thus, be clear that the right
Appellants
Versus
Shri. Uttamchand Tukaram Kamble
S/o Tukaram Kamble,
R/o MSEB Colony, Behind Taj Guest House,
Nagpur Road, Tal. & Post: Bramhapuri,
District
Appellants
Versus
Shri. Uttamchand Tukaram Kamble
S/o Tukaram Kamble,
R/o MSEB Colony, Behind Taj Guest House,
Nagpur Road, Tal. & Post: Bramhapuri,
District
Appellants
Versus
Shri. Uttamchand Tukaram Kamble
S/o Tukaram Kamble,
R/o MSEB Colony, Behind Taj Guest House,
Nagpur Road, Tal. & Post: Bramhapuri,
District
Appellants
Versus
Shri. Uttamchand Tukaram Kamble
S/o Tukaram Kamble,
R/o MSEB Colony, Behind Taj Guest House,
Nagpur Road, Tal. & Post: Bramhapuri,
District
Appellants
Versus
Shri. Uttamchand Tukaram Kamble
S/o Tukaram Kamble,
R/o MSEB Colony, Behind Taj Guest House,
Nagpur Road, Tal. & Post: Bramhapuri,
District
Appellants
Versus
Shri. Uttamchand Tukaram Kamble
S/o Tukaram Kamble,
R/o MSEB Colony, Behind Taj Guest House,
Nagpur Road, Tal. & Post: Bramhapuri,
District
Appellants
Versus
Shri. Uttamchand Tukaram Kamble
S/o Tukaram Kamble,
R/o MSEB Colony, Behind Taj Guest House,
Nagpur Road, Tal. & Post: Bramhapuri,
District
Appellants
Versus
Shri. Uttamchand Tukaram Kamble
S/o Tukaram Kamble,
R/o MSEB Colony, Behind Taj Guest House,
Nagpur Road, Tal. & Post: Bramhapuri,
District
