application, briefly stated, are that the defendant and Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) had entered into a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) dated 8.12.1993. The Government ... defendant on 10th February, 1994 guaranteeing payments due to the defendant from MSEB. On 15.9.1994, a counter guarantee was executed by the Government of India
relying upon a Division
Bench judgment of the Bombay High Court in MSEB v.
MERC AIR 2003 Bombay 398 stressed that the General
Conditions ... 2725/2005 Page 27 of 40
25. In MSEB v. MERC (supra) the Division Bench of the
Bombay High Court has categorically held that
manner suggested by Mr. Diwan. Fixing of such terms and conditions of MSEB also impinges on payment of charges by the consumers and are, therefore ... such service line charges, transmission charges etc. which were charged by MSEB will have to be approved by the Commission.
The portion in italics
fourth unit, requested the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (hereinafter referred to as MSEB) to set up a service line for supplying electricity. MSEB supplied ... electricity lines (the ownership in the cables being with the MSEB) and the assessed spent an amount of about Rs. 52 lakhs towards service charges
from customers on delayed payments as well as interest on deposits with MSEB and margin money deposits. However, the assessed was not allowed deduction with ... customers on late payment, interest on margin money deposits and interest from MSEB deposit. Accordingly, a show-cause notice was issued. In response
siding as well as existing Railway siding through broad gauge rail system. MSEB's Railway siding as project site shall be available in March ... required to unload the material either at Parli Vaijnath Railway Station or MSEB's existing Railway Siding and make arrangements for transportation
Maharashtra) entered into between the Enron and the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB). It is stated that the Mou was enterned into through close door ... Dabhoi (Maharashtra) by Enron, the power purchase agreement between Enron and Mseb and the guarantee and the counter guarantee by the State of Maharashtra
Sugar Corporation v. Sumac International Limited and Larsen & Tourbo Ltd. v. MSEB and Ors. as no case of special equities is made out either
Singhvi placed great reliance on Larsen & Toubro Ltd. v. MSEB and Ors. and contended that the learned Single Judge ought not to have interfered
Commissioner Of Income Tax Del vs M/S Shankar Trading Co. P. Ltd on 9
