filed by Maharashtra
State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (hereinafter
referred to as ‘MSEDCL’), the appellant herein, and Appeal
No. 354 of 2019, filed by Adani ... Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission
(hereinafter referred to as ‘MERC’).
2. APML and MSEDCL had entered into four long term
Power Project Agreements (hereinafter referred
CERC”.
3 Appeal No. 261 of 2013
4 “RGPPL”/first respondent.
5 “MSEDCL”/appellant.
6 “NAPAF”.
3
4. Consequently, there was correspondence between the appellant ... allocated to the State of
Maharashtra is supplied to the distribution licensee MSEDCL, the appellant. The
appellant and the first respondent entered into a Power
challenging the Advertisement issued by the
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited
(MSEDCL). They also challenged the GR dated May 31, 2021,
aggrieved ... category. Simultaneously, SEBC candidates filed
petitions seeking a directive to the MSEDCL to take the decision
allowing their participation in the EWS category selection process
challenging the Advertisement issued by the
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited
(MSEDCL). They also challenged the GR dated May 31, 2021,
aggrieved ... category. Simultaneously, SEBC candidates filed
petitions seeking a directive to the MSEDCL to take the decision
allowing their participation in the EWS category selection process
challenging the Advertisement issued by the
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited
(MSEDCL). They also challenged the GR dated May 31, 2021,
aggrieved ... category. Simultaneously, SEBC candidates filed
petitions seeking a directive to the MSEDCL to take the decision
allowing their participation in the EWS category selection process
challenging the Advertisement issued by the
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited
(MSEDCL). They also challenged the GR dated May 31, 2021,
aggrieved ... category. Simultaneously, SEBC candidates filed
petitions seeking a directive to the MSEDCL to take the decision
allowing their participation in the EWS category selection process
challenging the Advertisement issued by the
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited
(MSEDCL). They also challenged the GR dated May 31, 2021,
aggrieved ... category. Simultaneously, SEBC candidates filed
petitions seeking a directive to the MSEDCL to take the decision
allowing their participation in the EWS category selection process
challenging the Advertisement issued by the
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited
(MSEDCL). They also challenged the GR dated May 31, 2021,
aggrieved ... category. Simultaneously, SEBC candidates filed
petitions seeking a directive to the MSEDCL to take the decision
allowing their participation in the EWS category selection process
challenging the Advertisement issued by the
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited
(MSEDCL). They also challenged the GR dated May 31, 2021,
aggrieved ... category. Simultaneously, SEBC candidates filed
petitions seeking a directive to the MSEDCL to take the decision
allowing their participation in the EWS category selection process
challenging the Advertisement issued by the
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited
(MSEDCL). They also challenged the GR dated May 31, 2021,
aggrieved ... category. Simultaneously, SEBC candidates filed
petitions seeking a directive to the MSEDCL to take the decision
allowing their participation in the EWS category selection process
