reported as Air 1930 Privy Council 57, Siddik Mahomed Shaha Vs. Mt. Saran and others (5). It was observed' that no amount of evidence
with the case thereby made".
In Siddik Mohamed Shah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 PC 57(1), their Lordships of the Privy Council held
matter, relying upon the cases of Siddik Mahommed Shah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 PC 57 (1), Lala Hem Chand v. Lala Pearey
party to prove it, is stated in Siddik Mohammed Shah v. Mt. Saran and Ors. AIR 1930 PC 57, wherein it is held that
relied on by the Courts below, viz., Siddik Mahomed Shah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 PC 57(1), where it was held that 'where
their Lordships of the Privy Council in Siddik Mahomed Shah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 PC 57 (1) where a claim has never been made
reported in AIR 1930 P.C. 57, Siddik Mahomed Shah v. Mt. Saran and Ors. and 1999 (2005) C.L.T. 48 : 2004 (Supp
suit. In this connection he has cited Siddik Mahomed Shah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 PC 57, Trojan and Co. v. Nagappa Chettiar
decision of the Privy Council in Siddik Mahomed Shah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 PC 57 (1), wherein it was observed that, where a claim
plea which was never
put forward. (See Saddik Mahomed Shah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 PC 57 (1)).
Apart from this technical reason, even