Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Siddik Mahomed Shah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 PC 57(1) ; and, Hem Chand v. Pearey Lal , AIR 1942 PC 64. These decisions firmly establish

with the case thereby made". In Siddik Mohamed Shah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 PC 57(1), their Lordships of the Privy Council held

their Lordships of the Privy Council in Siddik Mahomed Shah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 PC 57 (1) where a claim has never been made

husband and wife are living apart by mutual consent, Ram Saran Das v. Mt. Ham Piari , AIR 1937 All 115 (E). In Sm. Chameli

view by another decision of this Court reported in Ram Saran Das v. Mt. Ram Piare

contention, the learned counsel has referred to Ram Saran Das v. Mt. Ram Piari AIR 1937 All 115 and Tek Chand Partabrai v. Kalawaritibai Tekchand

which I will make reference presently: 19. In Bam Saran Das v. Mt. Bam Piari A.I.R. 1937 All 115. Allsop J., has observed ... February, 1936, Mt. Ram Fiari (Wife) made the application which had given rise to those proceedings. She Slid that her husband Bam Saran

Pada Ganguly A.I.R. 1933 Clause 676 and Ram Saran Das v. Mt. Ram Piari . It further held that under Section 488, a Magistrate

Rang 210; Hari Singh v. Mt. Parbati AIR 1951 Him Pra 59; and Ram Saran v. Smt. Soman Wati 1964 (1) Cri LJ 488 (Punj

Allahabad High Court given in the case of - Ram Saran Das v. Mt. Ram Piari AIR 1937 All 115. We are, therefore, of the opinion