Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 70 (1.51 seconds)

Leru Lal vs State on 2 May, 2018

inspiring confidence. 3) Serious discrepancy in allegedly seized poppy straw (contraband) and Muddamal deposited in Malkhana inasmuch as seizure memo indicates total quantity of poppy ... relation to serious discrepancy in allegedly seized contraband from the appellants and Muddamal deposited with Malkhana. Undeniably, as per prosecution case, total 17 bags; twelve
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - P K Lohra - Full Document

Nagu Singh vs State on 10 May, 2016

which the recovery was effected, he deserves to be acquitted; (ii) The muddamal allegedly seized by the Seizure Officer Rajiv Joshi was not produced ... state owning to exposure by elements. Thus, he contended that as the muddamal was not produced in the court, it has to be presumed that
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - S Mehta - Full Document

Aziz Khan vs State on 23 May, 2016

read in evidence against the accused. He further submitted that the Muddamal was not produced and exhibited by the prosecution at the trial despite opportunity ... prejudice was caused to the appellants by the non-production of the muddamal in the court. He submitted that the two samples articles
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - S Mehta - Full Document

Hanuwant Singh vs State on 23 May, 2016

read in evidence against the accused. He further submitted that the Muddamal was not produced and exhibited by the prosecution at the trial despite opportunity ... prejudice was caused to the appellants by the non-production of the muddamal in the court. He submitted that the two samples articles
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - S Mehta - Full Document

Sagar Ram vs State on 13 November, 2017

weight of the samples collected by the Seizure Officer because the entire Muddamal was not presented and exhibited in the Court in the selfsame condition ... after mixing the contents of the bags. It is contended that the muddamal, which was produced in the Court was not bearing the seal chits
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - S Mehta - Full Document

Subhash vs State on 31 May, 2018

Singh (PW-14), it is apparent that prosecution did not exhibited seized muddamal in the same condition in which it was recovered. The bags which ... escape from the conclusion that no evidence was given about the seized muddamal by exhibiting it in the self same condition in the Court
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Lala Ram on 21 November, 2008

held in presence of Panchas and thereafter bodies were sent for autopsy. Muddamal motorcycle, tractor, Kulhari, pant, shirt, key and other articles recovered were sent ... police vide Ex.P/45. 18.The third circumstance is of Muddamal articles such as Kulhari, pant and shirt worn by accused, mobile phone
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - D N Thanvi - Full Document

Ladu Singh vs State on 5 October, 2017

challenge his conviction. He contends that the prosecution did not prove the Muddamal of the case in the selfsame condition. In order to fortify this ... Chaina Ram and pointed out that while exhibiting the Muddamal bags, the witness did not state that the same were having any identifying marks
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S Mehta - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next