Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 409 (0.76 seconds)

Uday Navinchandra Sangani vs Vikrant Pal Singh & 2 on 20 January, 2015

directed   the  Investigating   Officer   to   handover   42   gunny   bags   i.e.   the   Muddamal,  which   have   been   seized   during   the   investigation   of   the   FIR   being ... committed   an   error   by   passing   the   impugned   order  whereby the custody of Muddamal of 42 gunny bags has been handed  over to the respondent
Gujarat High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - V M Pancholi - Full Document

State Of Gujarat vs Kinit Jayanatilal Amin @ Aditya on 3 November, 2015

lapse on the part of  the   investigation   including   the   removal   of  the muddamal. 3. It   is   this   judgment   and   order   which   has   been  assailed ... submitted   that   the   panchnama   for   the   seizure  of   the   muddamal   are   also   proved   which   is   at  Exhs.72,   73   and   74.   He   also   referred
Gujarat High Court Cites 59 - Cited by 0 - R H Shukla - Full Document

State Of Gujarat vs Arvindbhai Bhulabhai Tadavi on 2 November, 2015

submitted   that   the   Court  below has also referred to the aspect of muddamal  and while recording reasons for the acquittal has  also emphasized about ... movement of muddamal or  some   discrepancy   in   the   record.   Learned   APP   Shri  Jani   submitted   that   however   the   Court   below   has  failed   to   appreciate   that
Gujarat High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - R H Shukla - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next