Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 816 (0.82 seconds)

Ricoh India Limited vs Commissioner on 4 May, 2012

model. This clearly shows that the printing function emerges as the principal function and gives the Multi-Functional Machines its essential character. Having such ... headings read, printer, line printer, dot matrix printer, letter quality daisy wheel printer, graphic printer, plotter, laser jet printer, inkjet jet printer and others
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Khanna - Full Document

State vs V.V.K. Sharma on 17 September, 2024

computer system containing one computer (HP) with TFT monitor and one multi functional printer (Rico) for use at the Regional Office of the Song ... suppliers for sending the three equipments namely the computer, monitor and multi functional printer to Bhopal by courier service. It is alleged against the accused
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Partha Pratim Bhattacharya vs Ministry Of Law & Justice on 11 October, 2024

officers. Point No. 2:-The facilities like telephone, intercom, internet facilities, Multi- functional printer, printer, Desktop, Biometric Attendance Machine, laptop etc. have been provided ... Kumar, DLC (Hindi Branch). Facilities like telephone, Fax service, internet facilities, Multi-functional printer, Desktop, etc. have been provided to Branch Officer (RL) and facilities
Central Information Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - H Samariya - Full Document

Commissioner Of Customs vs M/S. Atul Automations Pvt Ltd. on 24 January, 2019

respondents during October­November, 2016 imported certain consignments of Multi­Function Devices (Digital Photocopiers and Printers) (hereinafter referred to as “MFDs”). The Commissioner of Customs ... Part D of Schedule III Item B1110 dealing with used Multi­Function Printer and Copying Machines. Adverting to the provisions of the Foreign Trade
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 19 - N Sinha - Full Document

M/S Xerox India Ltd vs Cce, Meerut-Ii on 29 July, 2010

while contending that their activities were nothing but installation of Copiers-cum-Printers and no new product emerged from such activities. Even if the process ... functional. 5. Accordingly, during the period from April 2002 to November 2006, the appellants imported various parts/modules/accessories of Digital Multi Functional Printers, Copiers
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 52 - Cited by 10 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next