petitioner had classifies the item
sold by it as a Multi-Function printer and included the turnover in
respect of the said item ... filed returns before the assessing authority
classifying the item as a multi functional printer falling under
Entry 69(22) (c) (i) of the 3rd Schedule
consignment of multi function printers that was being
transported at the instance of the petitioner was detained by the
respondent
notice issued to him
detaining a consignment of Digital Multi-function Printers, that was
being transported at the instance of the petitioner. In the writ
December 2015
JUDGMENT
A consignment of Digital Multi-function Printers, that was
being transported at the instance of the petitioner was detained by
the respondents
Xerox machine having four drawers (Tray) and four wheels with colour Multi Functional Printer, but the respondent-O.P. delivered Xerox machine with two drawers
issued to him
detaining a consignment of old and used multi functional digital
printers with copiers that was being transported from Coimbatore
to Kalamassery
issued to him
detaining a consignment of old and used multi functional digital
printers with copiers that was being transported from Coimbatore
to Kalamassery
Shreya Singhal vs U.O.I on 24 March, 2015
Equivalent citations: AIR 2015 SUPREME
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications ... vs Commissioner Of Income Tax ??? Iii on 16 March, 2015
Author
Selvi J.Jayalalitha vs State, By The Superintendent Of Police on 11 May, 2015
Author
