deduction for self
expenses was made and multiplier of 11 was applied. The Tribunal awarded
a sum of Rs.29,17,000/- along with interest ... deceased was to retire at the age of 60, a split multiplier should
have been adopted by the Tribunal.
Learned counsel for the claimants argued
appellants argued that the
Tribunal erred in applying the split multiplier. He contended that
future prospects and compensation under conventional heads have ... Tribunal has not given any cogent reasons for
applying the split multiplier. The reliance is placed upon the decision
of the Supreme Court in case
argued that the multiplier of 12 has wrongly been applied. Learned
counsel further argued that no amount has been awarded for loss of estate ... said Schedule, there is no
provision for adding future prospects.
11. The multiplier of 12 has wrongly been applied. Keeping in
view
month. 1/2 deduction for self-
expenses was made; multiplier of 14 was applied and 30% future prospects
were awarded.
There is no dispute between ... parties with regard to the age of the
deceased; applying of multiplier of 14 and ½ deduction made for self-expenses.
Learned counsel for the appellant
Tribunal assessed the annual income of the deceased as `45,000/-.
Multiplier of 14 was applied and 1/3rd deduction was made for self expenses ... deduction for self-expenses
was made and multiplier of 15 was applied. The amount awarded included
`10,000/- for funeral expenses and loss of consortium
self- expenses. The total dependency
was calculated as ` 11,585/-. A multiplier of 11 was applied considering the
age of the mother of the deceased ... learned counsel for the appellants is that
the Tribunal erred in applying multiplier of 11 considering the age of
mother of the deceased.
Learned counsel
month.
1/3 deduction was made for self expenses and multiplier of 15 was applied
taking the age of the deceased as 38 years ... Card of the
deceased and his date of birth was 10.01.1975, hence, multiplier of 14 was to be
applied instead of multiplier
appeal, the grievances are that the income
assessed is on lower side; multiplier has been wrongly applied; no future
prospects have been added; the amount ... evidence to the contrary.
The Tribunal erred in applying the multiplier by considering the age of the
claimants. Multiplier is to be applied
have been awarded. The Tribunal erred in applying the multiplier of 13
considering the age of mother of the deceased. He further argued that ... contention of learned counsel for the appellants with regard to
application of multiplier deserves acceptance.
12. The Supreme Court in the case of Sube Singh
vide Ex.A2 as Rs.9022/- per month.
The Tribunal applied multiplier considering the age of the parents and
awarded ... deduction of Rs.1500/- per month from salary. He
contended that the multiplier should have been applied considering the age
of the deceased. His grievance
