After deducting income tax @ 20%, Rs.4,10,419/-
annual income
3. Multiplier 11
4. Deduction for personal expenses 1/3rd
5. Loss of dependency ... superannuation after six years at the age of 60 years, therefore,
multiplier of 11 applied by the Tribunal on salary drawn by the deceased
deduction for self
expenses was made and multiplier of 11 was applied. The Tribunal awarded
a sum of Rs.29,17,000/- along with interest ... deceased was to retire at the age of 60, a split multiplier should
have been adopted by the Tribunal.
Learned counsel for the claimants argued
Multiplicand (annualized) 54,000
(6000+3000=9000-4500)4500x12 per annum
5. Multiplier as per the age of parents 12
6. Loss of dependency ... income of the deceased but the Tribunal has applied a wrong
multiplier. The deceased was 25 years of age and the multiplier
appellants argued that the
Tribunal erred in applying the split multiplier. He contended that
future prospects and compensation under conventional heads have ... Tribunal has not given any cogent reasons for
applying the split multiplier. The reliance is placed upon the decision
of the Supreme Court in case
Company Limited Vs.
Pranay Sethi and others 2017(4) RCR (Civil) 1009, multiplier had to be
18. Counsel for the respondents have not been able ... 2205/- (after adding the
future prospects and deducting personal expenses). After applying
multiplier of 18 and adding the amount of Rs.70,000/-, the total
working hard, took notional income in said case at
`30,000/- applied multiplier of 15, and by giving `50,000/- towards conventional
heads awarded ... case of
Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation [3], the multiplier of
15 can be applied to the multiplicand. Thus
expenses qua domestic help by applying multiplier of 17
but an appropriate multiplier is required to be applied by taking into
consideration life expectancy ... regard to
services of an attendant @ Rs.6000/- per month by adopting multiplier of
17 to the tune of Rs.12,24,000/-. Counsel
detailed hereunder:-
1. Monthly income of the deceased Rs.4000/-
2. Multiplier 13
3. Deduction for personal expenses 1/3rd
4. Loss of dependency ... Claimants shall
be entitled to benefit of future prospects @ 25%. The multiplier and
deduction for personal expenses allowed by the Tribunal are affirmed. In
this
income towards personal expenses of the deceased, by applying
multiplier of '6' on the basis of age of parents of the deceased, awarded ... Learned counsel for the appellants contends that the multiplier
applied was as per the age of the parents of the deceased whereas the same
ought
argued that the multiplier of 12 has wrongly been applied. Learned
counsel further argued that no amount has been awarded for loss of estate ... said Schedule, there is no
provision for adding future prospects.
11. The multiplier of 12 has wrongly been applied. Keeping in
view
