erred in applying the multiplier of 11 keeping in
mind the age of the mother.
18. The issue of multiplier has been dealt by this ... Specifically, there was no
variation in respect of fundamental premise of „multiplier method‟
as held in Susamma Thomas. In Trilok Chandra, the apex court
arguments of the learned counsel on this issue.
8. The issue of multiplier has been dealt with by this Court in the case of
Mohd ... Specifically, there was no
variation in respect of fundamental premise of „multiplier method‟
as held in Susamma Thomas. In Trilok Chandra, the apex court
4646 of 2009 on 02.04.2013.
5. As far as the issue of multiplier is concerned, the same has been
decided by this Court ... Specifically, there
was no variation in respect of fundamental premise of „multiplier
method‟ as held in Susamma Thomas. In Trilok Chandra, the
apex court
arrive at the future loss of earnings (by
applying the standard multiplier method used to determine
loss of dependency). We may however note that
