make itself manifest in the premises of the establishment."
17. In Munchandani Electrical and Radio Industries Ltd. v. Their Workmen ... case is a radical departure from the law laid down in Munchandani's case (supra). Both Munchandani and Glaxo Laboratories were judgments of Benches
hold domestic enquiry.
He placed reliance in support of his contention on Munchandani
Electrical and Radio Industries Ltd. ..vs.. Their Workmen , 1975
LLJ 391, wherein ... vicinity thereof:
9. It is material to note that the judgment in Munchandani
Electricals was also rendered by three-judge Bench of the Supreme
Court
Allahabad High Court after referring the Glaxo Laboratories case ( supra) and Munchandani Electrical and Radio Industries, Ltd. v. Its Workmen ... this Court (S. gOVINDASAMY, J.), after referring. Glaxo Laboratories case ( supra) and Munchandani Electrical and Radio Industries case (supra), as well as Tata Oil Mills
followed a judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Munchandani Electrical and Radio Industries Ltd v. Workmen reported ... Supreme Court considered the earlier decision of the Supreme Court in Munchandani 's case and distinguished it in paragraph 12 of the judgment
questions the
witnesses, the inquiry proceedings cannot
be impeached as unfair. See : Munchandani
Electric and Radio Industries Ltd. v. Their
Workman.”
29. This Court
questions the witnesses, the inquiry proceedings cannot be impeached as unfair. See : Munchandani Electric and Radio Industries Ltd. v. Their Workman
indicative of based state of mind of the Enquiry Officer.
11. In Munchandani v. Electrical and Radio Industries Ltd. v. Their Workmen
Cooper Engineering Ltd v. P.P. Mundhe ); 1975 (1) LLJ 391 ( Munchandani Electrical and Radio Industries Ltd. v. Their Workmen
support of his arguments cited the judgement of Supreme Court in Munchandani Electrical and Radio Industries Ltd. vs. Their Workmen-1975 LLJ Volume 1 page
questions the witnesses,
the inquiry proceedings cannot be impeached as unfair. See :
Munchandani Electric and Radio Industries Ltd. v. Their
Workman"
20. Again
