village
Haldkeri. It is stated these facts are borne out of the
Muntakab. The defendants also contended that the
ancestors of the plaintiff have ... time to time of Hazarth Syed Abdul Khader Hussaini and
thereafter two muntakabs have been sanctioned. They
contended that one of the muntakabs
revenue records (pahani patrik, sethwar and Khasra Pahani)
pursuant to the Muntakab No.5091 dated 26.04.1954 and also
sought direction to respondent No.16-Tahsildar ... Wanaparthy, which was
then under Court of Wards for succession and for Muntakab (Inam
title deed). When the said proceedings are pending, his father died
Survey Nos.367 and 368
8. In the present case, a Muntakab was issued by a Jagirdar
Maharaja Kishan Prashad of the Nizam Government ... Fasli (1919) in favour of Khaja Jalal.
A copy of Muntakab is at page Nos.308 to 312 of Volume
Bukhtyar Khan And 2 Others vs The State Of Telangana And 14 Others on 28
Raunaq Yar Khan vs State Of Telangana on 28 October, 2024
Author: K. Lakshman
Bench
Raunaq Yar Khan, vs The State Of Telangana, on 28 October, 2024
Author: K. Lakshman
Bukhtyar Khan, vs The State Of Telangana And 52 Others on 28 October, 2024
Author
Survey Nos.367 and 368
8. In the present case, a Muntakab was issued by a Jagirdar
Maharaja Kishan Prashad of the Nizam Government ... Fasli (1919) in favour of Khaja Jalal.
A copy of Muntakab is at page Nos.308 to 312 of Volume
Survey Nos.367 and 368
8. In the present case, a Muntakab was issued by a Jagirdar
Maharaja Kishan Prashad of the Nizam Government ... Fasli (1919) in favour of Khaja Jalal.
A copy of Muntakab is at page Nos.308 to 312 of Volume
Survey Nos.367 and 368
8. In the present case, a Muntakab was issued by a Jagirdar
Maharaja Kishan Prashad of the Nizam Government ... Fasli (1919) in favour of Khaja Jalal.
A copy of Muntakab is at page Nos.308 to 312 of Volume
