Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Kesara Ram (Since Deceased) And Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 9 September

twice, no case of any murder was detected and instead it was found to be a case of simpliciter accident; (ii) the order of cognizance ... Purohit do not conclusively lead to the theory of murder and murder simpliciter, negating the possibility of accidental fall and resultant injury . However, with

following categories : 1. The deceased was last seen immediately before the murder with the accused persons. 2. Recovery of blood-stained Jali (Salang) ( Article ... murder. These circumstances are established against the accused Malsingh that the deceased was last seen in his company before his murder; that the dead body

though there is no justification, for the same, a case of murder was registered and investigation has been completed resulting in filing of a charge ... criminal conspiracy to commit his murder prior to his death and, as a result, this being a simpliciter case of accident, of late motivated

Pahar Singh And Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan on 14 October, 1998 Equivalent citations: 1999CRILJ1150

appellant, whether it is a case of murder, homicide not amounting to murder or a simpliciter case of causing grievous hurt. (3) Whether the appellant

assembly having a common object of committing their murder and in furtherance thereof they committed the murders of Prithvi Singh and Onkar Singh. After investigation ... convicted appellant Khinv Singh under Section 302 , I.P.C, simpliciter for committing the murder of Prithvi Singh and other appellants for the offences under

head injury resulted in his death and, therefore, it was an intentional murder specially when P.W. 11 Dr. R. K. Gehlot has clearly opined ... convicted and sentenced under Section 302 / 34 , I.P.C. simpliciter instead of under Section 304 Pt. I, read with Section

common object of which was to commit murder of Bhavi Chand and to cause injuries to the alleged interveners-rescuers (hereinafter referred ... other words he was convicted under Section 302 I.P.C. simpliciter also Each of the appellants was sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment

deceased victim, he cannot be convicted under Section 302 , I.P.C. simpliciter. His conviction under Section 302 , I.P.C. is, thus, erroneous ... that there was no common intention on their part to commit the murder of Khetdas. The trial Court refused to apply Section