omitted to
disclose the aforesaid fact to the DDA and intentionally caused the
DDA to mutate the aforesaid property in his favour individually. Thus ... false representation of the accused made to DDA. In my
opinion, the DDA by mutating the said property in favour of the
accused had actually
should obtain a probate before DDA could act under the will. Surprisingly, in spite thereof, DDA mutated the property in the names of defendants ... demise of Amolak Ram. Admittedly, DDA required Will dated 27.12.1983 to be got probated. Admittedly, DDA effected mutation ignoring the Will. Admittedly, DDA
order dated 1st February, 2012 of the DDA and seeking a
mandamus to the DDA to mutate the aforesaid plot in favour of the
respondent ... DDA to pass a fresh
order on the application of the respondent No.2.
4. The DDA thereafter vide order dated 22nd August, 2012 mutated
connivance
of the officials of defendant/DDA made representation to the DDA for
mutation of the registration in his favour, however ... nivance of cert ain
officials of defendant/DDA made representation to the DDA for
mutation of the registration, however, h is requ
Kishore by the
DDA, and continued to remain the same in the books of Respondent
No.1/DDA till the mutation dated 29.12.2008, as evidenced ... Indl. Area, Ph-I, Delhi.
14. As per extant policy of DDA, DDA is not forum to settle
the dispute and the parties may approach
Respondent, Delhi Development Authority ('DDA'), as well
as seeking a direction to the Respondent, DDA, to mutate the property
bearing MIG Flat ... NOCs, as filed before the DDA and the Trial Court.
In these facts, Respondent, DDA was statutorily obliged to mutate the
subject property in favour
Respondent DDA and in view
of the contentions, documents etc. of the parties, the DDA
was unable to grant mutation in favour of any particular ... were submitted to the DDA and DDA was requested to
transfer the said plot in the name of the partnership. DDA from
time to time
been disposed of on 10.4.2012 with directions issued to the
DDA to mutate the subject plot in favour of the petitioner."
14. I also ... illegal. No consequential direction
has been passed in the decree to DDA to mutate the plot back in the name of
W.P.(C) 11032
learned counsel for the DDA submits that by a reasoned decision
on 07.02.2018, DDA cancelled the said fraudulent mutation and
intimated the petitioners ... concerned Assistant Director, DDA.
7. In reply to contents of para 7, it is staed that DDA had
allowed the mutation on the basis
DDA and gave his statement on 09.01.1992 admitting therein the Will.
He has stated that the DDA issued a letter dated 17.02.1992 and a
mutation ... Criminal Appeal No. 792/2003 alongwith original DDA file, which
contained the proceedings before DDA for mutation.
14.5. Plaintiff's 5th witness
