suit property.
That she has not submitted any affidavit to DDA
regarding mutation of the suit property in favour
of the defendant no.1.
That ... that the mutation was got
done.
That the mutation was got done after five years
because it was the requirement of the DDA
legal notice through his advocate to DDA requesting therein
not to mutate the property in the name of Smt. Raj Rani and
apart from that ... then
Ld. ADJ, Delhi vide his orders dated 13.12.2003, the mutation
effected by DDA does not hold good and the orders dated
19.02.1998 passed
legal notice through his advocate to DDA requesting therein
not to mutate the property in the name of Smt. Raj Rani and
apart from that ... then
Ld. ADJ, Delhi vide his orders dated 13.12.2003, the mutation
effected by DDA does not hold good and the orders dated
19.02.1998 passed
best on 17.12.1984 when the
plaintiff had asked the DDA for mutation of the suit property. Suit
was filed on 7.4.1992; being beyond a period ... favour on 6.9.1984. On 17.12.1984 he had applied to the DDA for
mutation of the subject matter of the property in his name
basis of the aforesaid statements and the Will, the
DDA mutated the property in the names of the respondents/defendants ... appellant/plaintiff having given her no objection
before the DDA to the mutation of the lease of the land underneath the
property in the names
probate of the Will, the petitioner sought to apply to DDA for mutation
TEST.CAS.99/2008 Page 2 of 23
in respect ... obvious that petitioner had approached
DDA shortly thereafter and DDA took its own time in processing the
application for mutation. In fact, the respondent
being lapsed.
Finally, the petitioners applied for mutation of the said property in
November 2003 to the DDA on the basis of the Will ... property vide copy of application form
ExPW1/F. The DDA declined the mutation on account of objections on
21.7.2004 vide letter ExPW
remained
unchallenged and unrebutted. PW2 Rajbeer Singh, Patwari
from the DDA proved mutation of the said properties in the
name of the respondents and other ... clearly
stated in his evidence that the said mutation was done by the
DDA based on inheritance. The testimony of PW2 also
remained unchallenged. This
with the DDA seeking mutation. The Petitioners herein had also sought
mutation of the property in their name with the DDA on 9th March ... with the DDA. It was only when the
TEST.CAS. 106/2015 Page 2 of 7
DDA did not grant the mutation and the officials
petitioner applied for mutation; however, the request for
mutation was rejected by the DDA on two grounds. Firstly ... inordinate delay and
latches in filing the application with the respondent/DDA for mutation,
therefore, no ground for interference by this court is made
