know that the defendant had
fraudulently got the flat mutated in his name from DDA by
concealing the very important fact that his father ... know that the defendant
had got the flat fraudulently mutated in his name from DDA. It also
arose when the legal demand notice dated
said official of the defendant/ DDA again assured them that soon the mutation
would be done in her favour jointly with her daughter. Thereafter ... that there are no plausible grounds afforded by defendant/ DDA in
not executing the mutation in favour of the plaintiffs who are admittedly the actual
ever
moved any application to the Slum Department or DDA for mutation or transfer of
the property in his name. DW-1 further deposed that
been accepted acted upon by DDA or
other developmental authorities or by the Municipal or revenue authorities to
effect mutation, they need not be disturbed
plaintiff in the suit property. The property had already been mutated in
the name of plaintiff by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi. The
plaintiff ... handed over to MCD
for maintenance and for other purposes. The DDA has lost all
Suit No. 345/07 3/20
4
administrative control over
