Delhi under section 73 of The
DDA Act and section 80 CPC calling upon the DDA to mutate the
CS-373/09/01 Page ... however the mutation does not confer any ownership
rights in the property. It was also stated that any mutation done
by DDA in favour
copy of letter dated 20.08.2005
whereby DDA mutated the name of plaintiff's mother in the place of
plaintiff's father. The copy ... documents for mutation. It does not
mention that the mutation was of registration and it also does not specify
that the mutation was of allotment
Plaintiff was
aware of the fact that the Defendants had got DDA to mutate the
properties in favour of Defendant No. 1 in 2001 itself ... Page 11 of 18
Will formed the basis of the mutation by DDA of the properties in
favour of Defendant No.1. No declaration regarding
specified time. The Petitioner vide her reply dated
11.12.1982 requested DDA for mutation of her name in place of Ram
Dhan, whereupon by a communication ... litigation was pending
between the DDA and the Petitioner in respect of a demand raised by
the DDA for mutating the plot in the name
lease holder of a DDA plot and a third person, the DDA can
withhold mutation in favour of the legal heirs or make it subject ... claimed to have been raised by some officers of the DDA to
effect mutation in favour of the Petitioner. There is no escape from
petitioner on 29.12.2006
requesting it to submit the mutation documents, as per Mutation Booklet available
in DDA Office, so that his case could be processed ... that the case could
be finalized. Thereafter, vide letter dated 3.2.2011, DDA mutated the registration
in favour of the petitioner though for refund of registration
objection to the said Will whereupon the
said suit property was mutated by DDA in the aforesaid
names on 1st March 1996.
4. The learned ... never objected to it. Thereafter, the four sons applied to the
DDA for mutation of the suit property on the basis of the mother
been allotted flats by DDA. Thereupon, she made
a representation to DDA on 9.8.2010, informing DDA about the death of her
husband ... admitted position that prior to 9.8.2010, the
petitioner did not request DDA for mutation of the registration or allotment in her
name, though her husband
January, 2011 and thereupon she wrote a letter
dated 10.3.2011 to DDA seeking mutation of the aforesaid allotment in her name
and also submitted ... documents being submitted by the petitioner the registration and allotment was
mutated by DDA in the name of the petitioner, vide letter dated 4.7.2011.
Thereafter
that the plaintiff was aware of the existence of the Will.
DDA mutated the property in favour of defendant ... paying the house tax and whether the
property had been mutated by MCD and DDA. For 16 years after the
death of the original allottee
