omitted to
disclose the aforesaid fact to the DDA and intentionally caused the
DDA to mutate the aforesaid property in his favour individually. Thus ... false representation of the accused made to DDA. In my
opinion, the DDA by mutating the said property in favour of the
accused had actually
nominee of Shri Godha Ram and thereafter,
the DDA had also mutated the property in her name but since the Plaintiff
had not challenged ... initially a nominee of Shri Godha Ram in the Society, the DDA
mutated the property in her name in the year 1981. Though the nomination
within the stipulated time to the DDA and visiting the
office of DDA several times and requesting to mutate and
transfer the said registration ... DDA.
5. The DDA has filed a counter affidavit. The basic facts
are not disputed. It is also stated that the DDA vide letter dated
take any steps whatsoever to approach the
respondent/DDA for getting the registration mutated in
her favour. It is also an undisputed fact that ... respondent/DDA to the petitioner
which forms the basis of the claim of the petitioner that
the respondent/DDA had carried out mutation
been filed by Ms. Rashmi Dutt seeking a
direction to DDA to revoke the mutation and conversion to freehold of
the property bearing ... present proceedings this Court cannot
adjudicate upon the decision of DDA to mutate and convert the property
to freehold.
15. Consequently, the present application seeking
regards suits instituted in Delhi;
however a person applying for mutation before DDA on the basis of a Will is not
instituting a suit ... executed later
than the one presented before DDA?
In light of the aforesaid, Commission finds that DDA is required to clarify its
extant policy
legal heirs submitted requisite documents to
DDA, on the basis of which DDA mutated the suit property in favour of
plaintiff vide file ... Late Smt. (running into 36
Urmila Devi Sharma with DDA pages)
2. Copy of Mutation Letter dated 11.07.1997 in favour
DDA to cancel the mutations with
respect to suit property by claiming that said
mutations had been effected as DDA officials are
acting in collusion ... mandatory injunction be passed in
his favour and against DDA, thereby directing DDA to
cancel mutation effected in favour of defendants
namely Anil Kumar Ghai
Amritsar on 24.09.1989 to get the suit property mutated in her
favour in DDA. During crossexamination dated 15.01.2004, PW
1, Sh. Teeka Ram deposed ... Gaur on
25.04.1989 to get the suit property mutated in her name in the
records of DDA. This issue is decided accordingly.
Issue
barred under the Limitation Act . They also contended that
the DDA had already mutated the property in their name.
6. The DDA filed its written ... letter dated 1st August, 1991, the plot was mutated in favour of the
contesting Defendants. The DDA further stated that the conveyance deed in
favour
