wrongly recorded in the name of all
the heirs of Shevantabai vide Mutation Entry No.1184. According to the
plaintiff, defendant No.2 had prepared ... recording his name as owner in the revenue record and accordingly
Mutation Entry No.1223 was sanctioned. Raghunath expired on 10.04.1995
and after his death
watandars illegally sold portion of Gat
no. 15 and tried to effect mutation entry nos. 850 and 851. It is the
case of the petitioners ... survey no.8) on 22.09.1966 prior to re-grant of which
mutation entry nos. 850 and 851 were taken. However, the said
mutation entries came
defendants
no.03 to 05 have played mischief and got their names
mutated to some of the properties. Land Gut no.225
was mutated ... name
on 01-07-1973. It is, however, stated that the said
mutation had not given any right, title or interest
to her. That application
petitioner that the name of
Ms.Chauthubai Dharman Patil in the mutation entry no. 1566 and 1586
dated 16th September, 1956 and 2nd June ... respondent nos. 1 to 6 appeared for the first
time in the mutation entry no. 2030 and 4026 dated 20 th
December
Kacheshwar Deshpande was entered
under the order of Mamlatdar dated 10.08.1952 and Mutation
Entry No. 668 came to be entered in terms of the said ... granted as a new tenure to
Ramchandra Kacheshwar Deshpande and Mutation Entry No. 943
::: Uploaded on - 19/12/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 19/12/2019
watandars illegally sold portion of Gat
no. 15 and tried to effect mutation entry nos. 850 and 851. It is the
case of the petitioners ... survey no.8) on 22.09.1966 prior to re-grant of which
mutation entry nos. 850 and 851 were taken. However, the said
mutation entries came
watandars illegally sold portion of Gat
no. 15 and tried to effect mutation entry nos. 850 and 851. It is the
case of the petitioners ... survey no.8) on 22.09.1966 prior to re-grant of which
mutation entry nos. 850 and 851 were taken. However, the said
mutation entries came
security
but he applied to revenue authority on 04.05.1998 for
mutation and the application was given in the name of Yusuf
Ali who was already ... that even when this information was given and the objection to
the mutation was taken, Tahsildar Bansode present petitioner
No.1 passed order and sanctioned
handed over to the Bombay Improvement
Trust. On 10th December,1943 the mutation entries were made in the
name of the Bombay Improvement Trust ... orders made by the Revenue Authority, in the matter of
mutation would either govern or influence the decision in the civil suit
instituted
housing society
could not be registered and therefore, the land was
mutated in the name of 12 members as per their shares.
According ... owners sold their shares to the
defendants and thereafter, the defendants got Mutation
Entry No.17816 mutated, though there was no partition.
The defendants could
