After the death of her father, petitioner filed an
application for mutation on the basis of the Will dated
25.08.1975 before the Tehsildar concerned ... application
dated 04.05.1978 before the Tehsildar concerned
requesting for grant of mutation in terms of section 50
DLR Act.
g) Both these applications for sanction
succeeded
by his two sons Prabhu and Hemraj in equal shares. Mutation of land record was
accordingly carried out in favour of the two sons ... averments of the plaintiff that the
impugned sale deed as well as mutation obtained by the defendant on the strength of the
said sale deed
knowledge of the impugned sale deed dt.
02.11.1987 as well as the mutation order dt. 09.09.1988, vide which their portion of
the suit property ... been mutated in the name of the defendant, passed upon the
impugned sale deed. Thereupon the plaintiffs obtained the certificate copy of the
impugned registered
registered Will executed by Smt. Sushila Chandra, portion
of the property was mutated in the name of Sh. Harish Chandra, Dr.
Ashok K. Chandra ... further
submitted by respondent No.2 that the petitioner got the property
mutated, by getting his signatures on some papers and the same was
converted
consequence to decree dated 30.01.1964 was ordered and the suit land was mutated in the
name of Sh.Sees ... High Court of Punjab and Chandigarh that mere entry of mutation in the
name of the defendant would not furnish any cause of action
subsequently that defendants
no.1 and 3 have got the suit property mutated in their names to the
exclusion of the plaintiff and the defendant ... dated 04.08.1998 before the Delhi Municipal Corporation,
Rajpur Road for cancellation of mutation of the suit property which
Misc
sale deed, defendant
no. 1 and 2 have got the mutation in respect of the land without the
knowledge of plaintiff. Mutation entries in respect ... averred that when husband of plaintiff became aware
about the factum of mutation, engaged a counsel who inspected the
relevant revenue record and informed
sale deed the
defendant no 1 and 2 have got the mutation in respect of the land
without the knowledge of plaintiff. Mutation entries ... averred that when husband of plaintiff became
aware about the factum of mutation, he(husband of plaintiff) inspected
the relevant revenue record and informed
Respondent no.1 stated that since
property has not been mutated in the name of M/s Atma Ram
Properties Pvt.Ltd., therefore, the eviction ... favour of
Seth Laxmi Niwas Birla. He stated that the property was mutated
on 13.01.67 in the name of M/s Arya Dharma Sewa Sangh
officials of defendant/DDA made representation to the DDA for
mutation of the registration in his favour, however, the sam e was n ot
accepted ... mother vide letter dt.30/06/2009 and
requested for mutation of the registration in his favour and DDA vide
letter dt.13/11/2009
