said accused in collusion with Area Lekhpal,
Prahlad Singh got their names mutated on the basis of
report dated 18.8.1992 said to have been prepared ... vendor as dead had got
the said names of the accused mutated. According to
appellant, they had thereby committed the offences
punishable under Sections
record of rights for the year
1955-56 on the strength of mutation alleged to have been
made on 30.1.1966. The respondent was cross-examined ... record of rights for the years 1955-56 on the strength
of mutation alleged to have been made on 30 January 1956 and
sanctioned
continued to assert their rights and approached
the Board of Revenue for mutation of their names on sixty acres of land in
Survey ... life time. He has taken up proceedings
for getting his name mutated in revenue records and the litigation
continued. Irrespective of litigation, the documents clearly
proceedings taken on The basis of the will
including mutation of the name of the legatee, postponement
of sales under Sections 32F and 32G , entertainment ... authorities, who must be aware of the provisions of the Act,
wrongly mutated the name of Ashoklal in the revenue records
as the landlord
Director of Land Records, Punjab, wrote
to the Revenue Officer concerned for mutation of the land in the name of
the Punjab Wakf Board. Accordingly ... Patwari of the area mutated the
property in the name of the Punjab Wakf Board: Thereafter, the matter was
taken up by the dram Panchayat
Civil Writ Petition No.2274 of 1985 which was dismissed.
A mutation proceeding was also initiated for mutating the name of
the 1st Respondent which ... appellant. The name of
the 1st Respondent was ultimately directed to be mutated by order dated
31.5.1993 by the Board of Revenue. An application
Haji Sk. Abdullah filed an application before the
Tahsildar, Bhadrak for mutation of Razak's name in respect of the suit land ... agent of his father and also having regard to the order
of mutation in his favour, the deed of gift dated 21.2.1973 was valid
before the last date of submission of
application. The mutation entry, however, could be made on
November 22, 1996. It is thus clear, submitted ... property prior to the
last date of submission of application, but the mutation entry could be
effected in Revenue Record subsequently. But from that
Harishankar, the appellant
and respondent No. 1 had filed separate applications for mutation of their
name in respect of land bearing Khasra ... Will dated 10.2.1992. By an order dated 31.12.1996, the
15
Tehsildar sanctioned mutation in favour of respondent No. 1. That order was
set aside
maintenance way back in the year 1950. In furtherance
thereof, mutation was also entered in favour of Smt. Banti bearing
no. 3813 sanctioned ... High Court in appeal submits
that the subject land in dispute was mutated in the name of Smt.
Banti on the basis of the oral
