Search Results Page

Search Results

41 - 50 of 9845 (0.27 seconds)

Mohanlal vs Ramkanyabai on 23 November, 2019

Commissioner Indore Division, Indore. 2. The dispute between the parties is regarding mutation in the revenue records pertaining to the land bearing Survey ... partition proceedings commenced by Thavarlal, the land in question was mutated in the revenue records in the name of the petitioner on 26/09/2001
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - V Kasrekar - Full Document

Vakil Singh (Through Lrs) & Others vs Bir Singh & Others on 24 October, 2019

claimed qua their acquiring hencetitle, vis­a­vis, the suit land, through, mutation No. 661, and, mutation No. 662, mutations whereof, were, respectively attested ... against the defendants. Significantly, hence, the validity, of, attestation, of, the afore mutations bearing mutation No. 661, and, mutation No. 662, mutations whereof were attested
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - S Thakur - Full Document

Sharda Bai vs Kedar Singh on 21 August, 2019

Tehsildar, Antri, District Gwalior, whereby the learned Tehsildar has allowed the mutation proceedings in favour of respondents No.1 and 2. 2. It is alleged ... dismissed, on the basis of registered sale deed an application for mutation was filed and the Naib Tehsildar has allowed application for mutation vide order
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - V Mishra - Full Document

Hargovind Agrawal vs Mohanlal on 23 July, 2019

which the appeal filed by the petitioner against the rejection of mutation order, has been dismissed. The necessary facts for the disposal of the present ... application under Section 109/110 of the MP Land Revenue Code for mutation for their names on the ground that the suit filed
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
Previous   1 2 3 4 5   6 7 8 9 10 Next