settlement
arrived at between the parties in connection with the
revenue entries mutated in favour of the applicants.
This Court (Hon'ble Mr.Justice ... dated 06.08.2012 passed by the Collector,
Surat and accordingly, to confirm Mutation
Entry Nos. 1890, 2264, 2512 and 2524. It
is submitted that the issues
basis
of the said alleged gift deed, they have got mutation entry
bearing MR No.291, as such accused persons committed
the above offences ... that the accused persons by colluding
with revenue officials have got mutation entry in the name
of the petitioners herein. He submits that the petitioners
basis of the said alleged gift deed, they have
got mutation entry bearing MR No.291, as such
accused persons committed the above offences ... that the
accused persons by colluding with revenue
officials have got mutation entry in the name of
the petitioner herein. He submits that the
petitioner
information i.e. 04-01-2020, as regards the various mutation entries, it is
stated that the present applicant and other three persons have illegally ... accused Nos.1
to 3 and only in respect of three mutation entries, it is alleged that even the
present applicant, with common intention
attorney in the year 1996 and same is tried for mutating
entry in the year 2019 and therefore, applicant has committed
serious offence under Section
deed no.4168 was given
effect in the revenue records by mutation of entries.
4 At the outset, it is submitted by the learned advocate ... that the role
of the applicant was only to certify the entry already mutated by the other
revenue officers, pursuant to the registration
also. He also submits that sale deed was executed after
the entry was mutated on the basis of the order of the Prant Officer ... applicant and others. It further
appears that the Revenue entries were mutated after the order was
passed by the Prant Officer in RTS Appeal
years,
the only role is that the originally immovable property
was mutated in her name as legal heir as original
owner;
(iii) Considering the fact ... that the dispute pertains
to immovable property and the objectionable
documents (mutation entries) has taken place way
back in the year 1988;
(iv) co-accused
petitioner was entered into the revenue records by
making a mutation entry. The husband of respondent
No.2 subsequently claim that ... deceased
Ittappa. He challenged the mutation entry made in
favour of the petitioner before the Assistant
Commissioner, Jamakhandi. The said petition came to
be dismissed
period of lease.The name of the applicant is also mutated in the municipal record as owner. Whether the claim of the applicant ... civil suit.The role of the applicant in recording of mutation entry is yet to be decided in investigation , which is pending.
Learned
