mutation entries and the revenue entries do not decide the
issue of title in respect of the properties affected by the entries.
Notwithstanding the orders ... mutation entries and the revenue entries,
the aggrieved party can always establish his title by
approaching the Civil Court. At the highest, an entry
Will, the agricultural land was mutated in the revenue records
in the name of the petitioner vide Mutation Entry No. 288 on 16.02.1998.
The Circle ... Officer certified the mutation entry.
3.2 It appears that the respondents Nos. 4 to 12 addressed a letter on
02.04.2018 to the District Collector alleging
Upon the
death of Madhubhai Premabhai, on 30.5.1989, by mutation
entry No.595, the name of Chimanbhai Bhukhandas came to be
entered in the village ... deal with the entries made in the record of rights and dispute
regarding legality of such entries. Mutation entries do not
create any title
Dabholkar states that
Vatappatrak means allotment letter. PW-8 then gave mutation entries
no.3004 and 3005, which are at Exhibit ... allotment orders passed by the Collector and the Talathi after mutation,
vide mutation entry no.3004 and 3005, forwarded the same to him for
certifying
writ petition
are that the petitioners herein were aggrieved by two
mutation entries made in the records by the Talathi
pertaining to a property with ... Mohamad Khan and upon her demise on 05/02/2000,
the mutation entry No.1382 was certified by the Talathi on
23/09/2000, thereby
mentioned as "Kunbi".
(vi) Revenue record showing the mutation entries as well as other
revenue entries indicating how the family tree tallies with ... name of Bhiva Trambaka Ghotikar.
(iii) Learned counsel relied on Mutation Entry No. 1210 dated
23.03.1937 (page 202) mentioning that Bhiva Trambaka
Kokane died
therefore succeeded in seeing that the entries made
in their favour respectively Entry no. 3184 mutated in
favour of respondent ... record of rights vide entry No. 4892 on
15th February 2001. The petitioner herein
objected to the said entry being mutated in the
name
Gunthas, in the other
rights column. On 17th August, 1956 vide mutation entry
No. 2844 the names of Kamlya Patil, Ganpat Patil and
Hari Patil ... protected tenants. However, on 27 th
January 1959, pursuant to mutation entry Nos.3107 and
3108, the names of the protected tenants were unlawfully
deleted
Basavaraddi gave that property to her as her
share. Accordingly, Mutation Entry 1909 was effected.
Channaraddi and Ningaraddi gave joint report to the revenue
authorities ... enjoying
those properties as absolute owner. Thereafter Mutation Entry
No.1966 was effected in his favour. Since his father and
brothers obstructed his peaceful possession
Basavaraddi gave that property to her as her
share. Accordingly, Mutation Entry 1909 was effected.
Channaraddi and Ningaraddi gave joint report to the revenue
authorities ... enjoying
those properties as absolute owner. Thereafter Mutation Entry
No.1966 was effected in his favour. Since his father and
brothers obstructed his peaceful possession
