Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 57 (0.74 seconds)

Manojbhai Parshottambhai Movaliya vs State Of Gujarat & on 24 March, 2017

February   15,   1982.   Such  revenue entry, being Entry No.479 of 1982,  has  been   mutated   whereby   1/3rd  share   of   Ratanji  Govindbhai,   father ... agriculturists  purchasers. On 5th  March, 2001, Circle Officer  cancelled the mutation  Entry Nos. 828 &  836,  as   they   were   made   in   favour   of   non­ agriculturist
Gujarat High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 1 - S G Gokani - Full Document

Vakil Singh vs State on 2 January, 2017

post of Patwari of village Charkada, Tehsil Nokha entered the mutation entries on the basis of allegedly forged death certificates of Chunni ... were prepared on the basis of which, the accused entered the mutation entries. Learned cousnel for the petitioner submtis that the alleged incident
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kinjalben Vickykumar Patel vs State Of Gujarat & on 28 July, 2017

entry was mutated  in   the   names   of   the   applicants,   the   complainant  approached the Pardi Mamlatdar and filed objections to  such   mutation   entry.     The   entire ... 4801/2012 JUDGMENT mutation entry.    Based on the sale transaction, the  Mamlatdar   had   on   25.05.2009,   mutated   the   entries   in  favour of the applicants.   The entire
Gujarat High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - B Vaishnav - Full Document

Sundarlal Ramjibhai Sartanpara & vs State Of Gujarat on 28 July, 2017

Pandav,   made   an   application   before   the  concerned authority and got the mutation entry  posted in the year 2009 in his name as partner  of Shiv ... 18157/2017 ORDER Pandav, of getting the entry mutated fraudulently  under   the   pretext   of   the   order   of   the  Debts  Recovery Tribunal. This Court while deciding
Gujarat High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - S G Gokani - Full Document

Sundarlal Ramjibhai Sartanpara & vs State Of Gujarat on 8 August, 2017

Pandav,   made   an   application   before   the  concerned authority and got the mutation entry  posted in the year 2009 in his name as partner  of Shiv ... 18157/2017 ORDER Pandav, of getting the entry mutated fraudulently  under   the   pretext   of   the   order   of   the  Debts  Recovery Tribunal. This Court while deciding
Gujarat High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - S G Gokani - Full Document

Santosh & Anr vs State & Anr on 17 July, 2017

CRLMP-750/2016] mutation, the petitioners committed cheating by misusing the version of the respondent No.2 for mutation entries done in their favour. Learned ... entries are fiscal entries and do not create any right in property. Hence, no offence is made out pertaining to the wrongful fiscal entries
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - P S Bhati - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next