succeed to the property, suit is filed questioning
the certification of mutation entry No.4147 which recorded ... knowledge of the plaintiffs with
respect to certification of mutation entry in the name of
Siddappa which was certified in the year 2003. He also
scheduled properties. It
further comes out from the record that the mutation entry
with respect to the suit schedule properties came to be
effected ... specifically denied.
Defendant No.6 further asserts that in terms of mutation
entry in M.E.No.1471 there was transfer of rights from
defendant
village to his two sons, Govindanaik and Venkatanaik in
terms of mutation entry No.1294 in the year 1965 itself.
Therefore, the plaintiffs cannot claim ... favour of his two sons on 01st May 1965. The mutation entry
effected has not been challenged. The properties having been
13
divided are being
property was not handed over to Deva
Rao Jamdade nor the mutation entries were altered, as
the sale deed was never intended to be acted ... name continued in the mutation register. It is
only when the 1st defendant attempted to get the
mutation entries changed in her name, plaintiff became
taking advantage of
the marital relationship had subsequently secured change of
mutation entry to the name of the 1st defendant and had
thereafter sold ... subsequent change of entries which were
made in the said revenue entries, more particularly, to the
mutation entry rounding up her name and indicating
owner of the suit schedule property, except
producing the mutation entry from the year 1981-1982
onwards, which shows that Venkappa Bhovi is the
owner ... Hanamappa Bhovi, they have not taken any steps to
change the mutation entry. The steps have been taken
only in the year 1986 when they
Basappa, son of Puttappa and mutation order in D
No.3744. There was no objection to the said mutation
entry. Similarly for survey ... revenue authorities to mutate their names in respect of
the property held by her husband. Accordingly,
mutation entries have been made. The said properties
PRODUCED AT
ANNEXURE-F AND THE MUTATION ENTRY NUMBERS BEARING
ME NO.3408, MR NO.181/2008-09, MR 49/2017 ... dated
07.04.2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Belagavi and
the consequential mutation entries bearing ME Nos.3408 and
1379 and MR Nos.181/2008
appellate and revisional proceedings
respectively, the competent authorities set aside the mutation
entry in M.R.No.163-19/1995-96 made in favour ... Yeldur Hobli, Srinivasapura Taluk. Also called in
question was the subsequent mutation entry made in the year
2013 which
PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-K TO WRIT
PETITION AND QUASH THE MUTATION ENTRY MADE ON
28.7.1997 PASSED BY THE DEPUTY TAHASILDAR,
NADAKACHERI, KEREHALLIHOBLI ... 1998-99 vide Annexure-K and
also quash the mutation entry made on 28.07.1997 passed by
the third respondent
