Haribhai Chhotabhai and others have executed sale
deed which is mutated vide mutation entry nos.7081 and 7082. Mutation
entry No.7229 has been made ... Mihir Cooperative Housing Society
Limited. The same has been mutated vide mutation entry no.7357 and
7360 in the village records and the same
father of the plaintiffs namely Mr. Rasulbhai Kajubhai
vide mutation entry no.1838 with respect to suit properties by
furnishing of false information ... voluminous. According to plaintiffs, deceased Rasulbhai Kajubhai died
on 27.6.1960 and mutation entry qua suit property took place on
3.10.1961. Some of the property went
mutated in the record of rights in that regard. After almost 17 years from
the date of the mutation of the entry referred to above ... competent authority has certified on 22/10/1997 the Mutation
Entry No. 1851, dated 28/5/1997, made for removing the name from the
records
basis of the
same, the respondent no.1 got revenue entry mutated in his name
and no notice thereof under Section ... created fabricated document in the name of our father
and got mutation entry entered and this way, the respondents are
attempting to occupy our field
year 2004. On the basis of such false documents, the
entries were mutated in the revenue record of right with respect to such
right ... that much before the
registration of the F.I.R., the entries mutated in the record of right were
challenged before the Collector
passed by the Mamlatdar with respect to the Kacha entry No.4700 which
was mutated on 6th September 2011 on the strength of the sale ... sale deed, at that point of time, a kacha
entry bearing No.4700 was mutated in the revenue records on 6 th
September
passed by the Mamlatdar with respect to the Kacha entry No.4700 which
was mutated on 6th September 2011 on the strength of the sale ... sale deed, at that point of time, a kacha
entry bearing No.4700 was mutated in the revenue records on 6 th
September
failing to appreciate the legal
effect of the mutation of Revenue Entry No.45 entered on 26.04.1953,
which remained unchallenged by the original plaintiff
failing to appreciate the legal
effect of the mutation of Revenue Entry No.45 entered on 26.04.1953,
which remained unchallenged by the original plaintiff
application before the Prant Officer,
Jamnagar that his name may be mutated in the record of rights being
the successor through the original purchaser ... post: Masitiya, Tal and District: Jamnagar
and entry NO.367 dated 25.09.1964 has been mutated and that since sale
transactions, the disputed land is under
