aforesaid mutation. The share of
Sh.Mohinder Singh was correctly mutated, however, the share of late
Sh.Lakhwant Singh was not mutated. The revenue authorities ... number is 2287. The entry of mutation of the sale deed is only an executive
function of the authority and it neither creates any cause
plaint, situated in village
Liwalwali, Tehsil & Disttt. Sirsa, and the entries in the revenue
records showing the contrary to it are wrong ... made by Shri Het Ram in
favour of Jalu and Santa vide mutations No. 134 and 135 and
the orders of mutations of purchase
Kamla Devi And Another vs Kamla Rani And Another on 3 December, 2021
Author: Anil
Surinder Singh vs Pankaj Gautam on 4 February, 2019
Author: Anil Kshetarpal
Bench: Anil Kshetarpal
Partibha And Another vs Nandi Devi And Ors on 27 November, 2018
Author: Anil Kshetarpal
property. It is also proved that in the year
1997 itself, the entry of the property, on the basis of the judgment and
decree ... property was inherited by Sh. Ajmer Singh and Sh. Babu Singh
vide mutation Ex.P-19 from Smt. Geoni. The translation of the mutation
Sanjiv Kumar vs Siri Chand And Ors on 4 December, 2018
Equivalent citations: AIR 2019
