annual rent. That on basis of the same,
mutation entry no.1115 , dt. 01.06.1990 was entered in
the revenue record. Also the owner ... annual rent of Rs. 3500/-.
That on basis of same mutation entry no.1125, dt.
24.10.1990 was entered in the Revenue record. That the
effect
Entry to that effect, which is
standard practice in procedure. That Respondent has not
made any such endeavor to get any Revenue Entry
mutated ... with regard to the mutation of entry and the
applicants - petitioners want that the entry
which is mutated in the revenue record should
2007, the Tahsildar
and Naib Tahsildar avoided to record mutation entry in favour of
the complainant. Therefore, complainant submitted application
to higher revenue authorities ... Collector, Beed
directed the Sub-divisional Officer, Ambajogai to record the
mutation entry on the basis of decision of the Civil Court.
However, even thereafter
2007, the Tahsildar
and Naib Tahsildar avoided to record mutation entry in favour of
the complainant. Therefore, complainant submitted application
to higher revenue authorities ... Collector, Beed
directed the Sub-divisional Officer, Ambajogai to record the
mutation entry on the basis of decision of the Civil Court.
However, even thereafter
2007, the Tahsildar
and Naib Tahsildar avoided to record mutation entry in favour of
the complainant. Therefore, complainant submitted application
to higher revenue authorities ... Collector, Beed
directed the Sub-divisional Officer, Ambajogai to record the
mutation entry on the basis of decision of the Civil Court.
However, even thereafter
mutation of agricultural land in the name of applicant in revenue record.
Pursuant to application of respondent No.2, the mutation entry No. 1590
came ... cheated the respondent No.2 by getting mutated the
contentious agricultural land in her favour vide Mutation Entry No.1590.
The learned Magistrate, on receipt
claim of
alleged oral partition. He submits that the mutation entry relied upon by the
defendant no.1 does not show oral partition. He submits ... finding of the
first appellate court that many times the mutation entries are not effected though
there is partition of the properties between the parties
claim of
alleged oral partition. He submits that the mutation entry relied upon by the
defendant no.1 does not show oral partition. He submits ... finding of the
first appellate court that many times the mutation entries are not effected though
there is partition of the properties between the parties
claim of
alleged oral partition. He submits that the mutation entry relied upon by the
defendant no.1 does not show oral partition. He submits ... finding of the
first appellate court that many times the mutation entries are not effected though
there is partition of the properties between the parties
transfer of the said land are
null and void.
14 Mutation Entry No.1009 has been made after
once the registered sale deed had been ... Time and again,the
petitioners knew about such challenge to the
Mutation entry of the proceedings questioning the
actions of some of the respondents. Civil
