that based on the said vardhi given by
the 1st defendant, mutation entry No.451 of Kudegod
village was certified. However, name of the plaintiff ... appear in the record. It is thereafter, plaintiff realized that
mutation entry No.451 was wrongly recorded, in as much
as, name of the plaintiff
challenged
the order of the Deputy Tahsildar or the mutation entry
No.37/2007-08 in the suo motu proceedings, he was not
required ... could approach the competent authority if they
were aggrieved by the mutation entry effected. This order is
produced at Annexure-A. Thus, while the question
endorse of the petitioner attested mutation on
05.09.2008. The petitioners have no role beyond the mutation
entries which has been laid down in the precedent ... with mutation
proceedings heavily relied upon by the
respondent No.1. Mutation proceedings
are much more in the nature of fiscal
inquiries. "Mutation
power
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
2. A mutation entry was effected in the name of
Muniswamappa and his five sons vide ... order dated 04.04.2006
in RRT/CR/1445/05-06. The mutation entry was the result of
partition that had taken place between the members
post of Patwari of village
Charkada, Tehsil Nokha entered the mutation entries on the basis
of allegedly forged death certificates of Chunni ... were prepared on
the basis of which, the accused entered the mutation entries.
Learned cousnel for the petitioner submtis that the alleged
incident
defendant after the
death of Yallappa and as such, mutation entry came to
be effected in the name of the 1st defendant for which ... true that mutation of a property in the revenue
records does not create title nor any presumptive value
on title. These mutation entries were entered
entry in the
revenue records and/or for cancellation of any
entry in revenue record and/or for any correction
/ alteration / modification of entry ... dated 15.04.1995, the names of the
petitioners herein have been mutated under Mutation
Entry No.3051 dated 02.05.1995 certified on 14.06.1995.
11. The petitioners submit
2013 JUDGMENT
record.
3.4 The said entry came to be made 51 years
after the entry 1980 was mutated.
3.5 Therefore, the heirs of Somabhai ... another
Entry i.e. Entry No. 10829 and recorded the names
of present petitioners.
9.2 The said Entry No. 10829 came to be mutated
names of the
Petitioners were mutated in the revenue record in respect of the said lands. The
said Mutation Entries ... Respondent No.8 sought the setting aside of the Mutation Entry No.15579 as
also the order passed under Section 32G of the Tenancy
mutated in the record of rights in that regard. After almost 17 years from
the date of the mutation of the entry referred to above ... competent authority has certified on 22/10/1997 the Mutation
Entry No. 1851, dated 28/5/1997, made for removing the name from the
records
