such entry was mutated
and as soon as the appellants - original
plaintiffs came to know about the mutation of
such entry, immediately they have challenged ... time, legal advice was
given to the appellants - original plaintiffs
that entries mutated in the revenue records are
nullity and void ab initio and, therefore
property bearing Survey No.71/2
admeasuring Hectare 1.24.44 sq.mtrs. mutation entry
Nos.35, 38, 569, 604, 1243 and 1337 were made ... registered Sale Deed dated
01.08.1996 resulting in revenue records being mutated
by mutation entry No.707 and certified on 06.11.1996.
4. The Collector, Kutch, initiated
135D of the Bombay Land Revenue Code,
1879 in a mutation entry proceedings, as an oral
partition and rejected the suit. Thus, Ld. Trial Judge ... signed by the plaintiff and her
mother and relying upon that mutation entry no. 6181
vide Exh. 124, removing their name had been affected
waiver
name of plaintiff no.1 was mutated in
the revenue records by Mutation Entry No.598 on 05.11.1990.
Thereafter, name of plaintiff ... Patel defendant no.4
and his name is mutated in the revenue record vide
mutation entry no.1283 dated 10.6.1981. Even considering
cause of action
Ranchhodbhai, Bhikhiben Ranchhodbhai,
Mahendrabhai Ranchhodbhai, Induben Ranchhodbhai were
mutated in the revenue records by Mutation Entry No.1520 on
Page 2 of 53
Downloaded ... plaintiffs and Taraben
wd/o. Mahendrabhai Ranchhodbhai were mutated in the revenue
records by mutation entry No.2557 on 12.06.1996 which came to
be certified
authorities of the State. In execution of the said order,
Mutation Entry No.249 came to be certified. Lands bearing Gat
Nos.162/1 admeasuring ... Mutation of
record of right to reflect the execution and implementation of the
said order are evidenced by the possession receipts and
Mutation Entry
name of the Petitioner was already mutated
in the record of rights of the writ property by mutation entry
No. 4947 on 2 July ... against the order recording the name of the Petitioner in the
mutation entry was dismissed by the Sub-Divisional Officer
before
the revenue authorities and got the entries
mutated in his favour. The said mutation entry
is not at all binding upon the plaintiffs ... name of adopted
son is entered in the mutation register. On what
basis this mutation entry No.1809 came to be
effected has not been
exercised incidence of
ownership over the respective properties mutated against their
names vide Mutation entry No. 959.
28. There can be no duality of opinion ... were all mutated in the name of Vithu in mutation entry
No.959. Prima facie, it appears that the survey numbers which
were mutated
exercised incidence of
ownership over the respective properties mutated against their
names vide Mutation entry No. 959.
28. There can be no duality of opinion ... were all mutated in the name of Vithu in mutation entry
No.959. Prima facie, it appears that the survey numbers which
were mutated
